
Originally Posted by
Allegor
I'm assuming back in 1.0 female Highlander and Roes always existed and you just pretended they were always there when ARR was released, right? There was no need for an explanation to anything, unlike the newer races.
Au Ra were war refugees from the Far East granted asylum in Eorzea, which explains why they also start like any adventurer (time paradox shenanigans aside), while female Viera are members of the revolution group lead by Fran (who mentions some naive female ruler, might as well be the current Hrothgar queen?). I'm sure lore of male Viera joining in will most definitely be mentioned during either the MSQ or relic questline, just like how they explained the aforementioned Au Ra and Viera. If anything, it's Hrothgars who have no explanation whatsoever, they kinda just...appeared.
On the Hrothgar sidenote, in retrospect, it would've made more sense for their lore to state something like only males traveled to Eorzea to "test the land" and see if it's safe, afterall it was stated they were treated as a beast tribe at first and understandably not welcomed until they learned the common tongue. That way it would explain why females aren't playable [yet] without the convoluted excuse that a female Hrothgar is very rare - they kinda cornered themselves there, expect a retcon in the future.
PS: art quality aside, I'm not a fan of that female Hroth pic either, she's too human, but, if I'm allowed to say it, it seems nobody wants to play female characters that aren't conventionally beautiful or even...kawaii, so it wouldn't surprise me Hrothgals to end up looking something like that /sigh