It's time (Option to Hide other players Glamour)

[Krotoan]

It certainly appeared that way in your own mind.

My mind is the only one I can think with. I don't see why you'd bother to make that clarification.

Again, if SE 'solved' this request by turning off glamour completely on your screen, would you be ok with it?

No, because the request isn't to turn off glamours for everything. It's to be able to eliminate glamours chosen by other players that I don't want on my screen for whatever reason.

[Zabuza]

My biggest problem with this suggestion is the bigoted reason it was brought up. Poor widdle OP threw a hissy fit over seeing a man in a dress and wants to not have to see glamour's because their comforting gender roles have been demolished before their very eyes.

OP was someone who co-leads a glam FC. I imagine she's very particular about glamours and doesn't want to see outfits that look ridiculous to her. People always love to rush to bigotry. Either way, OP hasn't posted in awhile and others have been discussing it for different reasons.

[Lufir]

The best thing that would come of this change would be that we could hide the most overused glamour: adventuring sweater with those denim shorts. I don't get why everyone wants their Warrior of Light to be an e-girl.

[Canada_bangs]

The best thing that would come of this change would be that we could hide the most overused glamour: adventuring sweater with those denim shorts. I don't get why everyone wants their Warrior of Light to be an e-girl.

I can't speak for all of them but I WANT those blue jean shorts so bad. I just like looking casual. The biggest reason is because alot of the gear just sucks I think. It's either all dresses and boring armor or over done tops with that random long piece of sheet on the side. It's nice to just have a tank top and some jeans. That and some casual outfits really show off the female form alot better. I mean one of monk's AF gear is literally a tank top and some really baggy jeans so it's not like that combo doesn't make sense in the game already. It's literally an AF gear for monk so why not?

[SturmChurro]

I can't speak for all of them but I WANT those blue jean shorts so bad. I just like looking casual. The biggest reason is because alot of the gear just sucks I think. It's either all dresses and boring armor or over done tops with that random long piece of sheet on the side. It's nice to just have a tank top and some jeans. That and some casual outfits really show off the female form alot better. I mean one of monk's AF gear is literally a tank top and some really baggy jeans so it's not like that combo doesn't make sense in the game already. It's literally an AF gear for monk so why not?

Yeah, the jean shorts are pretty great. Not too hard to get either. Pretty perfect for a casual glam. What we need are some more good sneakers for females. There are a couple, but I need more!

[Lufir]

We also need t-shirts that say "California" on them, Hoodies with the Yankees logo, Nike snapbacks, and loungewear with big letters on the back that say "Pink" or "Juicy"

Please look forward to it.

/sarcasm

[SturmChurro]

We also need t-shirts that say "California" on them, Hoodies with the Yankees logo, Nike snapbacks, and loungewear with big letters on the back that say "Pink" or "Juicy"

Please look forward to it.

Agreed. They would have to change those name brand logos to things like 'Garlond Ironworks' or other in-universe brands/logos. Probably replace 'California' with 'Gridania' or something, but a good idea you have nonetheless.

[Awha]

I support this idea, though one change I would like to make is I would to be able to put people in whatever outfit I desire. I need more men in maidouts and wedding dresses.

[SnowVix]

OP was someone who co-leads a glam FC. I imagine she's very particular about glamours and doesn't want to see outfits that look ridiculous to her. People always love to rush to bigotry. Either way, OP hasn't posted in awhile and others have been discussing it for different reasons.

"Men in wedding dresses" was one of the things explicitly mentioned in the OP as a clam she didn't like seeing, so I didn't jump to it, she put it out there for the world to see.

[Zabuza]

"Men in wedding dresses" was one of the things explicitly mentioned in the OP as a clam she didn't like seeing, so I didn't jump to it, she put it out there for the world to see.

Sure, but let's say someone mentions fifteen different glamours they have a distaste for, and one of them is 'men in wedding dresses.' Does this make someone in a bigot for thinking it doesn't look good? You may be right on the OP, but I just am concerned that things like this can't be criticized on a taste perspective without everyone thinking that person has to be a bigot. What if you just think it looks tacky?