It's time (Option to Hide other players Glamour)

[Apopopo]

Because, as I have repeatedly said, my issue would be with other people using the toggle on me.

So why is it okay for you to have an issue with it, but not okay for someone else to have an issue with, for example, a roegadyn wearing a thong? Seems a bit one-sided. You either have both of neither, pick one.

(Hint: Good luck convincing SE to delete things they've already done.)

There are much more important things that SE hasn't fixed *cough* Viera and Hrothgar *cough* to justify wasting resources on this idea right now.

I mean seriously, if SE can't even spare the development time to include the new races in the hairstyles they release, let alone develop male Viera and female Hrothgar, let alone actually making helmets properly fit them or even letting them wear every single helmet in the game, then why should they waste their time listening to whiners who want something like disabling glamours of every single race, gender, and class because "muh immersion"

I get it, I hate that stupid frog suit that they added because it's creepy, I don't like seeing max height roes in metallic gold pig costumes, but people's fashion choices being a little weird just comes with the territory of being an MMO. Immersion flew out the window the day they added full body animal suits.

Two different issues buddy, last I checked, the guys coding aren't also the ones creating digital assets.

[Iscah]

(Hint: Good luck convincing SE to delete things they've already done.)

I fail to see your point when we're discussing something hypothetical that you would like SE to do, but they haven't actually done.

What would I need to convince them to delete?

[Dogempire]

Two different issues buddy, last I checked, the guys coding aren't also the ones creating digital assets.

Doesn't matter, it's still a waste of resources that could be better put into something else other than whiners on the forums.

If you want immersion and non-ridiculous glamours, go play an Elder Scrolls game or something

[3c-33]

So why is it okay for you to have an issue with it, but not okay for someone else to have an issue with, for example, a roegadyn wearing a thong? Seems a bit one-sided. You either have both of neither, pick one.

Uh, because on one end you're mad at someone's personal outfit choice, and on the other end people are not okay with others altering their own personal outfit choice without their consent. These are two very different things

[Zabuza]

Uh, because on one end you're mad at someone's personal outfit choice, and on the other end people are not okay with others altering their own personal outfit choice without their consent. These are two very different things

Funny that you use the word choice when you want to prevent other people from having one.