Quote Originally Posted by AmeliaVerves View Post
You were talking about silence tho.
We can argue wether or not that mentor was a dumb dumb for pulling too much, but being not very smart and being toxic are two very different things.

If you want to make foolishness report-able, ok, well, idk, but you just assumed this mentor was toxic and had selfish intentions, but you don't know for sure. Still disagree to this being toxic tho.
Becoming a mentor has nothing to do with your skill tho. You don't need to be a good player to become a mentor and while I think this is a problem, idk how this problem could be solved any other way than making savage clears a requirement. But then again rAiDeRs ArE tOxIc AnD eLiTiSt.
Did you really see just that? In this case, I understand why in this discussion it is customary to ignore the proof and turn uncomfortable examples inside out.

This dishonest discussion technique is called “pushing back the gate": no matter what evidence you are presented with, your bar of "convincing evidence" will arbitrarily shift. It has already been repeatedly.

Someone in this thread asked me to provide evidence that the recommendation system needs to be reformed. I quoted the same player in another topic, where she admits that she gives recommendations for beautiful glamor, completely not paying attention to how much this person knows the content.
For this proof, I was called a "stalker", although the discussion was just next door.