Mentors...please!

[RajNish]

Not so "universal" now is it? There has, to date, likely been no dissent on that wiki page simply because very few people even care to add or refine it. It's not a statement of FACT, so nobody can refute it.

But go ahead. Keep using generalized ideas held by a few people as a blanket statement as some universal truth (I suspect you don't even know what the term "universal truth" means).

P.S. Your own wiki doesn't work as throughout this entire thread, people are guilty of conflating and intertwining "gaming etiquette" with "moral human etiquette".

A good attempt to get away from the original topic and go on to discuss my knowledge of philosophy. Don’t worry, please, I remember the university course well enough. You initially raised the question incorrectly.

Several generations of players have grown up on a simple game system. Be polite, help others and work for the success of the group. As you see, it is not necessary to be Mother Teresa (by the way, I suspect you have not read criticism of her actions in the context of human rights). So yes, you don’t have to be Mother Teresa.

And, finally, with regard to the difference of cultures. This is again an incorrect comparison, since we are currently speaking in the paradigm of game culture, or rather, subculture.

This thread is not showing an illustration, it's showing an illusion, a few loud mouths who complain loudly because they met one bad mentor who left an impression and their friends told them or they read that all mentors are bad, giving a magnifying effect. You never notice or remember the good mentors. Human nature to more easily remember a negative experience.

If the systems worked well, you would not see an increase in the number of recommendations, as an attempt to fix it. Be the first to create a thread for thanks, and I will write there. At the moment I'm talking about the problem, I will write here because I consider it necessary and important, whether you like it or not.