Butt is flat again... Patch 5.15

[Iscah]

Having no personal interest in "butts" (I have one, I sit on it), I'm amazed just how much discussion goes into them around here...

Also you're eating some weird-shaped pancakes if smaller-but-still-curved is "pancake-shaped".

I think its funny they gave people who wanted this for a long time what they wanted.

then gave you back the squeezed toothpaste tube look again.

Funny you mention "squeezed toothpaste tube" - that's the mental image that comes to mind when I try on the dresses. They don't just narrow the waist but also the ribcage, and it looks incredibly unsettling to me.

Sorry, but the butts in 1.0 were not that big. The images used are heavily biased to make them look bigger than they were.

That misinformation has been spreading for years.

Indeed. We discussed it a while ago and concluded that it's misleading due to different poses in the two images - the 1.0 girl is stretching (torso forward, legs slightly bent) which makes her look bigger compared to the neutral pose.

[Kytrin]

Having no personal interest in "butts" (I have one, I sit on it), I'm amazed just how much discussion goes into them around here...

Also you're eating some weird-shaped pancakes if smaller-but-still-curved is "pancake-shaped".

Yeah I don't get it either. I see the curve just fine, so I don't really get why all the fuss about it.

[QT_Melon]

Having no personal interest in "butts" (I have one, I sit on it), I'm amazed just how much discussion goes into them around here...

"Having no interest in the side lives of NPCs it's amazing how certain forums dedicate themselves to them" You do understand that we all don't share the same interests and though we can have many interests in one thing? If it isn't that important, there was no reason to dedicate a coffer to them in raid, that gave the INCENTIVE to run that raid multiple times instead of only running it for the item drops that week. If glamour wasn't important, then there wouldn't be contests, websites showing gear etc... not just from fans but by the company itself.

Also you're eating some weird-shaped pancakes if smaller-but-still-curved is "pancake-shaped".

Shape is not the equivalent of depth. Circle is not a Sphere.

A pancake is often referred to a FLAT object talking about its DEPTH. While Shape (round) is also its feature, they're not synonymous terms.

It would be as ridiculous as coming in and chiding people about how someone describes that characters run like feathers (describing weight) and exclaiming "I don't know where you people come from where people look like feathers!"

Indeed. We discussed it a while ago and concluded that it's misleading due to different poses in the two images - the 1.0 girl is stretching (torso forward, legs slightly bent) which makes her look bigger compared to the neutral pose.

It's not that misleading actually, and what you're PERPETUATING however, IS. Neither rear was large, there hasn't been an argument about it being HUGE, in 1.0 There was however an argument about what was largER is now missing.

See youtube post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hV_...youtu.be&t=509



The body's internal balance is a recognizable thing in anatomy, especially artistically (to the point, yes some embellishments may occur) my other post also showed this later but I'm sure it was skipped.

So yes, the appearance of the rear is actually kinda important to people aesthetically not because people just like looking at butts, but also because it balances out the human body.

Thankfully later posts from you are more well reasoned, but I was seriously disappointed in seeing this kind of condescending passive aggressive response from you.