So, this isn't normal right?

[SturmChurro]

Unfortunately, the "fix" for this will probably be nerfing the raid bottom butts now as well.

[Fawkes]

Unfortunately, the "fix" for this will probably be nerfing the raid bottom butts now as well.

They might have accidentally broken the 2B gear. Maybe when they adjusted them they saved it using the wrong bones or something.

[SturmChurro]

They might have accidentally broken the 2B gear. Maybe when they adjusted them they saved it using the wrong bones or something.

Why would they touch the butt in the first place if the issue with 2b was skin tone coloration of the top? The leg part? Maybe, but why would the butt still be there on tops that don't have anything covering the butt, or waist? That is a slim hope, I never have said I couldn't be wrong, that would be a good hope for players if you were right though.

[Iscah]

Why would they touch the butt in the first place if the issue with 2b was skin tone coloration of the top? The leg part? Maybe, but why would the butt still be there on tops that don't have anything covering the butt, or waist? That is a slim hope, I never have said I couldn't be wrong, that would be a good hope for players if you were right though.

People did complain about it clipping through skirts as a bug. They've fixed the bug - apparently by putting it under the same "deactivated by specified chest gear" part of the leg model as things like sashes and the ill-fated Quaintrelle's skirt.

Presumably the actual fault is with which tops are set to deactivate it, which seems to be a blanket setting rather than judged by the individual pieces. They probably need to review that setting.

[SturmChurro]

People did complain about it clipping through skirts as a bug. They've fixed the bug - apparently by putting it under the same "deactivated by specified chest gear" part of the leg model as things like sashes and the ill-fated Quaintrelle's skirt

Presumably the actual fault is with which tops are set to deactivate it, which seems to be a blanket setting rather than judged by the individual pieces. They probably need to review that setting.

If that's true, then I am absolutely in the right in the butt thread. Smh.

[Fawkes]

Why would they touch the butt in the first place if the issue with 2b was skin tone coloration of the top? The leg part? Maybe, but why would the butt still be there on tops that don't have anything covering the butt, or waist? That is a slim hope, I never have said I couldn't be wrong, that would be a good hope for players if you were right though.

They changed the stockings also. The glamour version used to only dye on the top bands, now the entire stocking dyes and I assume now has your skin tone underneath. The raid versions weren't changed and still dye the old way.

[SturmChurro]

They changed the stockings also. The glamour version used to only dye on the top bands, now the entire stocking dyes and I assume now has your skin tone underneath. The raid versions weren't changed and still dye the old way.

It's pretty funny that SE would overhaul 2B, flatten the behind, but not touch the near carbon copy raid bottoms. Just saying, when you guys get your "fix" these are gonna be just as flat.

[Ariane]

They changed the stockings also. The glamour version used to only dye on the top bands, now the entire stocking dyes and I assume now has your skin tone underneath. The raid versions weren't changed and still dye the old way.

All the stockings are showing your skin tone underneath now, even the raid stockings. You can confirm this by either looking at them through glass or through the surface of water. The spots with the nylon will disappear and will just appear like its bare skin in those spots. They apparently can't stack two different transparent effects.