[Request] Please remove the daily post limit!

[CazzT]

You're entitled to your opinion. Sorry but 20 is more than enough in my view. We aren't in an age where we need people to spam forums with their point of view. State your position and live with it. Having to respond to every reply isn't necessary.

You mean the very thing you're doing here?

Isn't that the same reason we have police and laws? Hm...

Um... are you being serious?

And yet I still see trolls dwelling on the forums. Daily cap helps mitigate that.

It really doesn't.

[LaylaTsarra]

You mean the very thing you're doing here?

Yes responding to frivolous posts like this one is a perfect example of why the limit should stay at 20. Thank you for giving me an opportunity to illustrate my point.

[JohnSpawnVFX]

Yes responding to frivolous posts like this one is a perfect example of why the limit should stay at 20. Thank you for giving me an opportunity to illustrate my point.

Your point boils downs to pettiness ("I don't want to see people I dislike being able to post more") and lack of self-control ("I'd go and reply to every post directed at me, if I had the chance to"), making you a bad example and a fringe of the population, therefore your point is ill fit to apply to everyone else.

Just because you don't want to see X user posting more and couldn't stop responding to people, doesn't mean everyone should be limited. Besides I've seen too many good discussions stiffled because one of the people ran out of daily posts. Not every thread is a debate where you only need one post to make your stand.

[LaylaTsarra]

making you a bad example and a fringe of the population, therefore your point is ill fit to apply to everyone else.

Oh so how did you determine I represent a fringe of the population? Have you conducted a comprehensive survey of the forum population and know this to be a fact? I'm entitled to an opinion that the current limit is fine. I don't need to clear my view with you before I post it.

My experience is those who run out of posts are generally involved in exactly this type of back and forth. Calling my view petty doesn't stimulate good discussion. Carry on I'm done responding here.

[HyoMinPark]

Yes responding to frivolous posts like this one is a perfect example of why the limit should stay at 20. Thank you for giving me an opportunity to illustrate my point.

I do hope you see the irony in your behavior at least.

LOL. All those novels you wrote in that "optimal rotations" thread, were all read by me XD. It may look like no one does because you get no direct reply to it, but this is something I've learned over the years - people don't know what to say to well thought out long posts. There is nothing to add to it, kind of letting it have its moment.

Well, I am glad you at least read them lol. I usually just assume people don’t because I have to repeat myself to those who do reply, because their answers tend to completely gloss over/ignore points I already brought up. X3

[ErryK]

Um... are you being serious?

Are you? It's a valid analogy, please make an actual argument.

[CazzT]

Are you? It's a valid analogy, please make an actual argument.

You're comparing posting on a forum to breaking the law. In the history of analogies that are not valid, yours is by far the least valid.
You tell me to make an actual argument because you can't counter the argument already made.

[JohnSpawnVFX]

You're comparing posting on a forum to breaking the law. In the history of analogies that are not valid, yours is by far the least valid.
You tell me to make an actual argument because you can't counter the argument already made.

Rules of the board effectively are the laws of this board. Not to mention that laws aren't just to stop bodily harm/death of people and taking people's possessions. You can call the police because someone is standing in your private property and won't leave, even if by standing there they aren't doing anything to you besides being a nuisance.

Board rules have the same spirit in mind.

[ErryK]

You're comparing posting on a forum to breaking the law. In the history of analogies that are not valid, yours is by far the least valid.

Please tell me how it wouldn't be valid when the daily cap is a restriction placed upon users for their own good, just like how laws are restrictions placed upon citizens for their own good. You quite literally said 'restrict the many because of the few', and laws do just that. People just can't help themselves.

You tell me to make an actual argument because you can't counter the argument already made.

I can't counter it because you didn't even attempt to make an actual response, lol. You literally just asked me if I was serious and that was it.