Results 1 to 10 of 56

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Krojack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    761
    Character
    Avellin Adorel
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by frostmagemari View Post
    I mean.. They have to see by now that just adding more wards isn't the answer. I don't know if they plan to actually address the core problem, but just adding more wards all the time is a band-aid at best.
    Instanced housing wouldn't keep people tired to their account subscription. With the current system it forces people to keep and active sub and login once in a while else you lose your house.
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    Eldevern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,009
    Character
    R'lileen Min'enoth
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Krojack View Post
    ...
    The problem is... there's no proof. Especially since wards mix individual and FC house and "old owners" can own several plots.

    How many players who have the gils give up to get a house because the risk to lose, not only the house but event items too?
    How many player give up to make gils to get a house?

    They said we were not going to lose house... and we can lose house.

    I've lost two mansions, I have the gils and no intention to play the trick again. And from what I understand, i'm not the only one who think that way. "When we are caught we are taught". SE should remember that.

    And... I can't get ride on the fact more or less a vast majority of the players I know since the beta definitly left the game. Some of them owned a house. So... I kinda doubt the bond tie is that strong.
    (0)
    Last edited by Eldevern; 10-05-2019 at 08:18 PM.

Tags for this Thread