Quote Originally Posted by Alklios View Post
I'm seeing this quite often, this is referred to as the "False Cause Fallacy", or immediately coming to conclusion that correlation equals causation. A wrongful kick is a wrongful kick regardless of how often it happens.

Despite how many disagreements you get in with someone, that is still no license to completely deny them the work that they have done with you. A wrongful kick is a wrongful kick no matter -how much- you dislike someone. And I want Square to have an intervention to reimburse lost progress to a meta line of thought, which I'm seeing here, that disagreements are congruent to harassment. A paid service needs to provide protection or insurance against player abuse.
But... that's the point we are all trying to make. Just because you *say* it is wrongful, that doesn't mean it's wrongful. What is your definition of harassment? SE's definition of harassment is doing anything that impedes other players' fun in the game. That might mean giving people unwanted advice. Telling them how to play their jobs. Calling them out. Saying, "Run to A when B happens" is fine, but telling BLM over there to learn how to play his job right and calling him out is not. That is, for all intents and purposes, harassment. This is not WoW. You cannot tell people to git gud, you cannot tell them to L2P, and you cannot tell them they're pulling shit numbers. That isn't how this community works.

With that being said, reexamine your actions and what you said to these people that resulted in getting kicked. If it's happening repeatedly, there's a 99.9999% chance it isn't wrongful at all, and that's where your argument is falling flat.