And in 1.20b we'll have...

[TheRac25]

sorry this "mount" ruins my immersion. Wild thing can't be tamed..................... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUcA7...eature=related Id much rather have a wagon and have people ride with me a million times over than that stupid piece of a mount

apearantly you didnt get too far into the uldah storyline cause the control was sabotaged
ooops

[Jennestia]

apearantly you didnt get too far into the uldah storyline cause the control was sabotaged
ooops did i just destroy your argument?

It didn't state adventurers (players) could tame just any beast, however -- it clearly stated you need training to do as such, and training always means a certain profession would be better at it than just any random adventurer fresh of the carriage, which is why I can personally feel that being tied to BST or Shepard even would have been a better choice for this.

[Altareon]

It didn't state adventurers (players) could tame just any beast, however -- it clearly stated you need training to do as such, and training always means a certain profession would be better at it than just any random adventurer fresh of the carriage, which is why I can personally feel that being tied to BST or Shepard even would have been a better choice for this.

You didn't train your chocobo either, and they're wild beasts. Are you saying we shouldn't have mounts at all?

[Elexia]

You didn't train your chocobo either, and they're wild beasts. Are you saying we shouldn't have mounts at all?

Pretty sure her post said nothing of the sort. You were given a chocobo that was already raised and told to take care of it and raise it further. They have some wild nature to them but they're not feral monsters that'll rip you to shreds, you know, like monsters? You know, like what a Goobbue is?

A class that can tame MONSTERS makes more sense and we already know Shepard deals with animal control of some kind, which was already a planned class, by the way.

[Altareon]

Pretty sure her post said nothing of the sort. You were given a chocobo that was already raised and told to take care of it and raise it further. They have some wild nature to them but they're not feral monsters that'll rip you to shreds, you know, like monsters? You know, like what a Goobbue is?

A class that can tame MONSTERS makes more sense and we already know Shepard deals with animal control of some kind, which was already a planned class, by the way.

So someone trained your Gobbue and now you have to take care of it further.
You know there was a period where dogs were wolves and yet I don't hear anyone saying buying a dog is unrealistic because you didn't tame a wolf.

[Elexia]

So someone trained your Gobbue and now you have to take care of it further.
You know there was a period where dogs were wolves and yet I don't hear anyone saying buying a dog is unrealistic because you didn't tame a wolf.

There are domestic dogs and there are wild wolves of all kind. Dogs have been domesticated much like cats, however there's still wild breeds out there. Goobbues aren't domesticated animals or have certain "friendly" breeds, they're monsters and nothing more and what better way than to tame a monsters than having a class that does that?

If we're using this dog analogy, there has to be lore that stated Goobbues are friendly monsters and the ones that's been killing us were just black sheep of the bunch. Why people are so against new classes is beyond me.

[Altareon]

There are domestic dogs and there are wild wolves of all kind. Dogs have been domesticated much like cats, however there's still wild breeds out there. Goobbues aren't domesticated animals or have certain "friendly" breeds, they're monsters and nothing more and what better way than to tame a monsters than having a class that does that?

If we're using this dog analogy, there has to be lore that stated Goobbues are friendly monsters and the ones that's been killing us were just black sheep of the bunch. Why people are so against new classes is beyond me.

I'm not against new classes but I seriously doubt SE will add a new class just to justify a little present for people who stuck around when they started charging a subscription fee.
And by your logic there's nothing in the lore that states there aren't domestic Gobbue. If you don't like it just don't get a Gobbue.
Further you can tame a beast and give it to someone and it won't immediately regress to feral behavior. You know how like when they return gorillas to the wild (feral animals) and they still remember the sign language they were taught?
Face it, you're just complaining to complain.

[Arcell]

There are domestic dogs and there are wild wolves of all kind. Dogs have been domesticated much like cats, however there's still wild breeds out there. Goobbues aren't domesticated animals or have certain "friendly" breeds, they're monsters and nothing more and what better way than to tame a monsters than having a class that does that?

If we're using this dog analogy, there has to be lore that stated Goobbues are friendly monsters and the ones that's been killing us were just black sheep of the bunch. Why people are so against new classes is beyond me.

There's no lore stating that you can't ride a Goobue, thus the possibility is there for them to add the lore that supports you being able to. Clearly there exists evidence suggesting we will be able to. They could add it in as easily as they did materia. Someone who was previously not in Eorzea is now here and knows how to tame Goobues. There we go, now it's lore.

[ShadowCadja]

You were given a chocobo that was already raised and told to take care of it and raise it further.

What tells you it won't be a Gobbue that was raised/tamed and told us to take care of it?

[Jennestia]

You didn't train your chocobo either, and they're wild beasts. Are you saying we shouldn't have mounts at all?

I'm reading over my post and I've yet to see where I stated this.