There is no reason that they can’t make the 3 fun and add a 4th. I understand what you’re getting at, but making 1 additional engaging healer play style isn’t an insurmountable task.

There is no reason that they can’t make the 3 fun and add a 4th. I understand what you’re getting at, but making 1 additional engaging healer play style isn’t an insurmountable task.
I absolutely agree with this. I just think making ALL healers fun is more important than having more healers, and any request for more healers should be prefaced with “and fix the existing ones, and if you can only do one or the other, fix the existing ones”. Given the lack of effort that SE seems to have put into healers this expansion I feel a bit paranoid that if we ask for a new healer they’ll just do that because they don’t think they’ve done anything wrong or they won’t admit that they’ve done anything wrong and have no real interest in making our lives better if they can get away with not doing it.



there reason was they wanted to fix the other three before adding a new one so there was a reason
I know SE is capable of making healers, all jobs even, that has unique playstyles and their own theme and asthetic in Heavensward. But I can't shake the feeling some priorities got lost in the 4.0 and 5.0 patch and I hope we soon get to know more what reasoning went into it. Would want them to make the existing healers good to play and appeal to different playstyles first, then challenge themselves to make something completely different as a 4th Healer entry.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



