In response to your edit, Ceallach.

Quote Originally Posted by Ceallach View Post
You say that, but the "no differences" thesis is hardly settled science.
And yet there are more studies being published with an increased efficiency in methodology to support that the science is pretty much settled at this point. For instance, that article you've provided was posted int 2012, one of the articles I linked was submitted in 2014 for posterity's sake. If you want me to find more up to date articles, that can be arranged.

Further, the statement that "homosexuality is biologically present in humans" is probably the most logically incoherent thing you've said. Tell me, how do you get offspring via two men or two women without intervening with things like donated sperm? On the other hand, obviously a heterosexual couple can create their own children via the conventional method. Human biology is very obviously in favor of heterosexuality, therefore homosexuality is not biologically present in humans. Rather, if there was anything about sexuality to call a "social construct," it would probably be this. Humans have always been fascinated with the idea of claiming the taboo, after all. This looks much more psychological to me, for the sake of sticking to science.
Yet science purports that it's literally nothing to do with "claiming the taboo" and more evidence supporting the fact that there is a biological precedent considering heterosexual parents are having gay kids. This is precisely the reason why you can't "cure" homosexuality. Yes, there is a psychological aspect present, but that also includes heterosexual individuals as well. They didn't wake up and decided to prefer the opposite sex, that's something literally hardwired into them. The same goes for homosexual individuals. If you want to tell me that heterosexuality is a social construct, feel free to claim that. Homosexuality is not a new phenomenon, it's existed since the dawn of humanity. The difference is that we kill people a lot less now for simply being gay.

If you're positing that homosexuality is a choice for the sake of taboo and degeneracy, I pinky promise I'll crush you on that topic. No question.