[Spoilers] I’m irrevocably Unimpressed

[MomomiMomi]

Because we're making a distinction between Sentience and Sapience, whether or not all those arguing that point fully understand the correct terms.

We're not just Sentient, we're Sapient.

And I am arguing that it's wrong because those things are sentient. They're not sapient, but they are sentient. Therefore, it's wrong.

If you want to draw the line at sapience and ignore sentience, then on what grounds are you doing so? What makes that the line that must be crossed before it's wrong?

The Ascians, similarly, have concluded that we do not have what it takes for it to be considered wrong to use us in the way they have planned to. We have sentience, and sapience. That's not enough, though. They have decided you need something more. Just the way that most people have come to the conclusion that sentience, or even life itself, alone is not enough.