
Originally Posted by
dragoelete
just cause hyd is a light aspected primal doesnt mean she is everything that is aspected to light... just look at the way they are zod was summoned to keep life as it is (which is stasis) while hyd was summoned to allow new life to live(which is activity)[/hb]
Again...please show me the spot where it was specifically said that was the case?
Citation needed.
Zodiark was summoned to prevent a calamity. After being tempered by the summon it was those Ancients that wanted to keep bringing back others, at the cost of new life. Zodiark did what was asked and created NEW LIFE.
Hydaelyn was created to shackle and bind She was passive and ironically meant to create a stalemate
To go into this further Neither concept of Light and Dark came into existence from what is told UNTIL the Calamity and summons. Saying that Hydaelyn is not the very concept of Light and Zodiark is also not doesn't make sense since they were basically brought into concept as just that. Still need info on verfying that.
One other thing, aren't we getting Ascians mixed up with Amaurotine? The immortality issue has to do with the sundering. It sounds like the first people had lives and children. So death and birth were obviously there? If anything a rejoining (and again don't exactly favor this as it does lead to loss of life) would render the currently immortal Ascians mortal again.
I don't think it should be looked at which primal is good or bad. Both or Neither of their existence is needed as balance. That is important to note. Both at the purest spectrum have shown to be damaging to the environment.
Hydaelyn never gave creation to new life, only found a way to preserve the souls that were already there through reincarnation. STASIS. Zodiark was the one that gave new life. ACTIVE but wants summons to keep changing life. Hydaelyn was there to prevent of said new life from being destroyed over and over.