Quote Originally Posted by asheryon View Post
its the same, ps4 pro to ps4 or to ps1 or etc...the point is the same....you are accepting lowering the quality of a product as something natural....would you be happy if SE came and said "hey guys we are gonna remove X job from the game because its broken (or any reason)", then you ask why is it that every day gaming companies are becoming lazier when they develop ports.... then they charge you 100 bucks for a broken mess of a game and you go all happy and say "oh this is fine!!!!"
you are only mitigating the impact because "its just fps", but that doesnt even matter, the fact of removing something that is expected or was announced is bad, it doesnt matter if its fps, a job or the entire msq. for you "its just fps" for some other guy it could be really important...(just as if they removed rdm and that would be your main, YOU would care, any non rdm player, wont).
A complete and total misrepresentation of what I said. Of course, no one would dispute that lowering quality is a good thing (and I'm not suggesting that it's good). What I find funny and hard to wrap my head around is the hyperbole among these reactions. 90 FPS isn't "unacceptable." Sub 30 FPS is unacceptable. So, again, it's not that I would support a lowering of quality, but it's the insinuation that 90 FPS is this horrible thing. It's really not .