Quote Originally Posted by Veis_Alveare View Post
The difference is less players are female and less players play male characters . This is why we see so much favor towards glamour with female characters, something I would imagine the group of people complaining about a lack of male Viera would be aware of.
Then here's the question - why invest so much in male Hroth? Why introduce them at all? Cut costs by reusing the Viera assets on the males instead of making two different races. And then you likely gain a better profit because as has been speculated often enough in this thread, male Hroths would likely not be as popular as male Viera.

You're equating the results of devs pandering to men with the results of pandering to women. These aren't the same.
They are not, nor do they need to be, nor was that even my point. My point is that pandering to people who want male Viera would be more beneficial and profitable than pandering to those who wanted male Hroths.