Quote Originally Posted by Physic View Post
thing is, you said that was an old response, the new TOS says that even talking about forcing a playstyle maybe actionable, so kicking for playstyle may not be a thing anymore. i'll look for the quotes, sec.






so, expressions that compel a playingstyle are nuisance behavior, which if it is found to be extremely hurtful, or obstructive can lead to action.

here they explain some obstructive behavior, which on its own is actionable.




i think kicking someone from an instance is on par, especially if leaving the party can be seen as obstructive.

seems the gms probably needed more in the TOS to cover them taking action.


also id like to point out, premades in discord kicking some guy to get their discord guy in, is pretty much manipulation of expulsion voting. Which is one reading of the story in the OP.
thing is, i dont see "we dont see eye to eye so lets go our seperate ways" as the same thing as compelling a playstyle. and since square is choosing not to elaborate further with how their new ToS interacts with the differing playstyle retoric, we can only assume that it has not changed.

i dont think that they queued with the intention to kick the pug tank, just that thats where it led and they had another tank in discord that they could call on.