Quote Originally Posted by Seraphor View Post
So you'd rather we didn't get Hrothgar, in order to get equal gender representation of Viera?

Did you intend to change to a male Viera?
If so, I'm sorry.
If not, it just sounds like self-righteous moralizing.

I'm looking forward to changing to Hrothgar.
Honestly, I would rather not have this version of Hrothgar. It looks like a Roegadyn with face paint on. It is very slapdash, compared to Viera/Au ra/Miqote (other animal races). They could have quickly rushed a male viera together by making the changes they did for female viera, as they would have a template, then worked on getting us a complete Hrothgar in a later xpac. Would I like a lionboy or liongirl? Yes. Do I want this one? Not Really. Now that we have it, I wouldn't advocate it to be removed, but I WOULD advocate they finish both races by doing the opposite genders. The lore reason for genderlocked Viera is as flimsy as genderlocked Miqote, and there is no reason at all for genderlocked Hrothgar. The dev reason is a choice they made. They could have planned better around it. Clearly they realize this or wouldn't be talking about considering feedback.

Before you say: "But they said they won't do other patches with races"... that was a decision they announced here and now that they have Viera and Hrothgar. We don't know the reason for this, and we don't know that having done only 1 they wouldn't have done the second before putting a limit.

This whole thread is a joke, having your "opinion" be to put down other people's desires for a complete race just because you don't want to contest something is dumb. If not enough people want it, that is one thing, but to tell people they shouldn't want something that is perfectly reasonable is just rude.