I'm going to assume you're referring to me. That's cool. I came into the thread asking genuine questions, based on my interpretation of the OP's post. Could've been easily cleared up if the OP had posted just once in the (now 4) days since.
Instead, 3 days later someone else decided to answer my post, thinking they could provide a satisfying answer. Saying they wanted to play a guy because they're a guy. That's fine and all, but still doesn't answer why there can't be a female only race. They even went as far as to say their characters represent them, and they want eye candy.
So I in turn asked them if their current eye candy was not sufficient, and if a male bunny would best represent them. And if not, what would be the point of a feminine male bunny? How would that represent them better?
Fair questions, again based on how I interpreted the OP's request for a male Viera "with heels." I thought he was asking for basically a male that looked just like the female, based on him adding "with heels." This still has not been clarified by him personally, so I'm still not sure if he meant shoes or not.
If the above were true, then it would be pandering, and it would just be a social justice case. Because they're only asking for it, because others got the female version, and the female version just isn't good enough for them, yet they want the same thing. I've since apologized for that initial misinterpretation of the OP's post, and also for the term social justice.
A later post someone brought up being gay, which had nothing to do with it. I never mentioned anything about it either. And really, just because a guy wants to play as a guy, doesn't mean we can't get an all female race. They simply won't play as that race if they don't want to.
Also, it still doesn't answer the question why they would want the males to look like the females. (Again, based on my initial interpretation.) Because they wouldn't play the females anyhow due to how they looked.
The same poster brought cross-dressing into the argument. This also had nothing to do with it. I wasn't hung up on the act of a guy wearing heels. I was hung up on why the male had to look like the female (in my mind) right down to the shoes they wore. I explained that in my next post.
That same poster came back, accusing me of not being able to handle a guy wearing heels. And assumed I'd get in their face and try to police their behavior. Again, this had nothing to do with what I said. Just the first of many assumptions made.
My next few posts were ignored where I explained what I'd like to see.
The very next post came at me with a history lesson on cultures of the world, and how they all dress differently. Great! Still wasn't at all what I was talking about. Then that same person came out of left field with their end comment trying to imply I was racist towards a fictional race!
Then I get accused of taking things "too far." Really? Because I interpreted the OP's post of basically what they said? What every "we want male Viera" post says? That the females are good and all, but we really won't be satisfied without their male counterparts.
Next I respond to someone, and basically get told my thoughts and posts are unnecessary. We're getting super tolerant now.
They play the victim card in the OP's stead. Yes, that poor OP that has not been victimized at all, and who I feel is quite capable of being able to post too.
I get accused of having a "hilariously fragile ego," while I'm literally apologizing to that same person for the social justice remark. Probably ignored my later posts where I clarified what he's still accusing me of. But again, I explain that I'm not offended by what he thinks I'm offended by, and am still trying to progress towards a civil discussion.
Which is greeted with "ignore the troll." How to shut down discussion of differing views.



Reply With Quote



