I'm sorry but the OP is pretty clear, and goes as far as giving detailed figures:They refer explicitely to every skill learned in dungeons and trials. Not exclusively Lv.50 dungeons. And, by the way, there are some Lv.50 dungeons that you can solo to get a skill.24 out of 49 spells are locked behind dungeons/trials. There is no way or extremely hard to solo them.
Well, people argue that they can't do that stuff solo, but I'm ready to prove them wrong for a good number of instances (not all, obviously).
If now you want to add the condition of being able to solo everything needed to learn skills at the same level as the content you are trying to do, you can, but I cannot help you in that case, as you are asking for something quite different.
Oh, if that's what you want to do, then go for it!
Sorry that I hurt you with facts
I just want people to use good arguments. If I can disprove them with objective statements, then they aren't good arguments.
Edit for the sake of clarity: I already explained why I was doing that. If you don't use good arguments, if you are using easily refutable stuff or even inaccuracies, then you will never get what you want from SE. If you think that actually trying to get people to understand how to argue better in order to get what they want is "trolling" or "white knighting", then you are shooting yourself in the foot.
Regarding the current subject: it is factually true to say that a lot of skills can be acquired solo. Even a lot of the ones in dungeons/trials/raid. If you complain that "we can't easily get 25 skills from dungeons/trials!", SE can simply say "oh, just go get them somewhere else or use the undersized party option to do them at level 50!"
Square Enix is like these bad genies. As soon as you wish for something, they will try to find the flaws in what you said to either deliver something you didn't actually wished for, or simply not deliver at all while throwing a few dissapointing sentences in the next liveletter.
If I argue so hard against bad arguments, it's to get good arguments that SE can't bruff off easily. If you think that's qualifies as trolling, then keep what you're doing. We'll see who was right when SE will answer. If they ever do.
Edit2: "Thanks" to Deceptus, I was able to see that quote: No, I blacklisted you because you had no respect for my time, I already told you. The only way to hurt people with facts is to contradict some of their precious subjective opinions. Unfortunatly for you, I almost never state my personal opinion. I mostly argue with objective statements, proofs, and facts. You will never hurt me with facts, they are the very tool I use to argue.
Others: "28 skills cannot be obtained by playing solo! But SE said it was a solo job!"
Me: "Actually, you can learn a lot of "dungeon spells while playing solo. And SE also mentionned party play with BLU."
Others: "OMG! You are such a troll! White knight! Condescending prick!"
This is basically what most "debate" I have boil down to. You might understand why I do blacklist some people. Including you.