

So they had to remove it? Why did they implement it since they had known they were going to use it for another job?
Did YOU think about that? Apparently not. Thanks for the help though troll. Carry on.![]()



There's a lot of answers to this but I'll use the common one:
They decided to use it for something else later.


Acceptable answer but goes right back to the question of why PT search is still not done, which yes I know it's almost done but I was being facetious when I answered the other posters question or a smartass; which ever you prefer, because they make things, add them then decide to remove them. lol
The military has 2 sayings:
K.I.S.S. Keep It Simple Stupid and work smarter NOT harder. SE is doing neither at this junction
I looked around and no one addressed this. What is bad with party search? I use it just fine. People haven't been using it, though.Acceptable answer but goes right back to the question of why PT search is still not done, which yes I know it's almost done but I was being facetious when I answered the other posters question or a smartass; which ever you prefer, because they make things, add them then decide to remove them. lol
The military has 2 sayings:
K.I.S.S. Keep It Simple Stupid and work smarter NOT harder. SE is doing neither at this junction
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote

