Housing Woes

[Numenor1379]

If you don't have a single friend that can enter your house when you're on vacation, then maybe there's something wrong with you.

Obviously my characters were created with these houses, I totally didn't have to work for them.

You are saying the demo timer should be lowered to provide more houses for players, yet own most of a ward. Absolutely hypocritical, yet typical. You want "fairness" but only for everyone else.

[MaybeOliverB]

You are saying the demo timer should be lowered to provide more houses for players, yet own most of a ward. Absolutely hypocritical, yet typical. You want "fairness" but only for everyone else.

How is it hypocritical? I've used my houses for years. I see people that don't and players without houses have to wait 45 days to get a shot at them. Just because I put in way more effort into housing than 99.9% of other players doesn't mean I'm an hypocrite, get off your high horse.

[Numenor1379]

How is it hypocritical? I've used my houses for years. I see people that don't and players without houses have to wait 45 days to get a shot at them. Just because I put in way more effort into housing than 99.9% of other players doesn't mean I'm an hypocrite, get off your high horse.

You are a hypocrite for complaining of the unfairness of the housing system while owning more than two houses on one server. Give up 22 of your houses, then you can talk about being fair.

[AriesMouse]

You are a hypocrite for complaining of the unfairness of the housing system while owning more than two houses on one server. Give up 22 of your houses, then you can talk about being fair.

The issue is though, the houses were, I'm assuming, acquired fairly (before the rule change, correct me if I am wrong).

It is up to SE to balance things out, not the players, that by SE's own rules, did nothing wrong at the time. SE shouldn't make housing a finite resource.

This is literally an issue of "don't hate the player, hate the game(devs)."

It's like you're yelling at someone that they are being unfair for eating several cupcakes at an all-you-can eat sweets buffet, where the baker intentionally didn't make enough sweets based on their average customer population.
Is the housing system unfair? Yes.
Is it the fault of people that own more than one house? No. So long as the houses were acquired within the rules of the game, the only person you can rightly point blame to is SE. Once people learn this, and start putting the squeeze on them, and less on their fellow players, this housing issue might actually be solved. In the mean time, keep infighting, and staying distracted with that, so SE can sit on their hands about it.

[Aldotsk]

It is up to SE to balance things out, not the players, that by SE's own rules, did nothing wrong at the time. SE shouldn't make housing a finite resource.

This is literally an issue of "don't hate the player, hate the game(devs)."

It maybe developers fault for their errors, but you are clearly saying that it is okay for one to be jerk to others knowing that others are feeling struggled for something they cant obtain.

Developers can control the management of the houses, but developers cant control players being a jerk.

[MaybeOliverB]

You are a hypocrite for complaining of the unfairness of the housing system while owning more than two houses on one server. Give up 22 of your houses, then you can talk about being fair.

So because I put way more effort into something than you, I am not allowed to comment on it? Nice logic. Also why 22? I'd still have more than 2

It maybe developers fault for their errors, but you are clearly saying that it is okay for one to be jerk to others knowing that others are feeling struggled for something they cant obtain.

Developers can control the management of the houses, but developers cant control players being a jerk.

My suggestions would only advantage players that don't have access to housing, go read my posts again. By the way, you've yet to show evidence where I've led someone on regarding offloading this ward to someone else. You've dug your hole way too deep to get out.

[Numenor1379]

So because I put way more effort into something than you, I am not allowed to comment on it? Nice logic. Also why 22? I'd still have more than 2



My suggestions would only advantage players that don't have access to housing, go read my posts again. By the way, you've yet to show me evidence of me selling the houses to a roleplayer, I'm still waiting.

22 because I did a quick count of your signature. Regardless, if you were really concerned about being fair you would only own two. The dumb 7d idea would not fix anything and only cause problems. 45d is fine for the auto-demo timer.

[Numenor1379]

The issue is though, the houses were, I'm assuming, acquired fairly (before the rule change, correct me if I am wrong).

It is up to SE to balance things out, not the players, that by SE's own rules, did nothing wrong at the time. SE shouldn't make housing a finite resource.

This is literally an issue of "don't hate the player, hate the game(devs)."

It's like you're yelling at someone that they are being unfair for eating several cupcakes at an all-you-can eat sweets buffet, where the baker intentionally didn't make enough sweets based on their average customer population.
Is the housing system unfair? Yes.
Is it the fault of people that own more than one house? No. So long as the houses were acquired within the rules of the game, the only person you can rightly point blame to is SE. Once people learn this, and start putting the squeeze on them, and less on their fellow players, this housing issue might actually be solved. In the mean time, keep infighting, and staying distracted with that, so SE can sit on their hands about it.

There was a reason I said "give up". Sure the houses were aquired fairly. But him then complaining about fairness is idiotic.