Significant changes in models would require significant changes to all existing equipment. All 10s of thousands of it. Not gonna happen. Anything like that kind of effort on models is gonna be going towards making entirely new races.

Significant changes in models would require significant changes to all existing equipment. All 10s of thousands of it. Not gonna happen. Anything like that kind of effort on models is gonna be going towards making entirely new races.
Last edited by ShinShimon; 10-22-2018 at 09:41 AM.



That's why this is called work, and that's why we are constantly paying them.
Yoshi-p said this after being asked about a F2P model : "Currently we are earning an unimaginably large amount of money across the global here, so we must continue providing our services." (Source)
Delivering nothing but hair about character creation is unacceptable knowing their current capabilities.
Last edited by LeoLupinos; 10-22-2018 at 09:41 AM.
I'd agree with this. It's worth pointing out that the FFXIV team is around 350-500 members depending on how busy the period of time, not including management (Source). That's a huge number of resources, particularly considering that FFXIV is a very established entity with presumably-optimal workflows.That's why this is called work, and that's why we are constantly paying them.
Yoshi-p said this after being asked about a F2P model : "Currently we are earning an unimaginably large amount of money across the global here, so we must continue providing our services." (Source)
Delivering nothing but hair about character creation is unacceptable knowing their current capabilities.
Given this, and given the relatively mundane content cycle updates that we've been 'treated' to for years now, it's reasonable to expect that there's enough bandwidth to be seriously working on the game's infrastructure in order to ensure it properly supports XIV's growth into the future. In fact, it's certain they're already doing this: we've seen evidence at various points of increased capabilities (expanded Housing wards, the Glamour Dresser, inventory size expansions, DX11 graphical tweaks). The main concern in my mind is whether they're making the right decisions on what to prioritize or not. We've seen some pretty blatant whiffs from the development team when it comes to acknowledging or addressing player concerns, with Eureka being the most serious recent example. We've also seen infrastructure improvements be routed toward additional revenue streams, particularly the mobile app (extra Retainer capacity, Chocobo Saddlebag capacity, Retainer interface improvements).
We'll see where things end up. Thus far, I don't know that SE has really felt significant pressure to shake up their delivery model or really put in AAA levels of work; XIV has thrived off a rather enjoyable trip to level cap, shrugging off longer-term monotony-induced subscription losses. But the game is profitable enough that they can do more if they wanted to, and from a quality-of-game standpoint, from a customer service standpoint, they should do more.



An occasional full hardware upgrade comes with the territory.
![]()







I agree, but having more control over the facial feathure wouldn't. And tbh this is what needs to be worked on the most.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



