Quote Originally Posted by AppleJinx View Post
But what the heckie is with the random secondary stats though?! They really don't want people to be making multiple weapons when the content is relevant do they.
Quote Originally Posted by Vulcwen View Post
How bad the secondary RNG is would depend on several factors:
- Is just the stat selection randomized, or also the number of stats and how much of a given stat you get (range of possiblities)
- How much grind does it take for an attempt.
Well, might as well just jump in here:
The whole 'random substats' thing people get way to riled up about, yet again seems to be little more than the result of a unofficial shoddy translation of an already somewhat vague interview posted on reddit which people somehow have taken as gospel.

This Interview has been picked apart and retranslated by now, as well as another few tidbits have been posted from another interview which pretty much show its not even half as bad as people make it out to be.

The 'random stats' aren't that random, in fact, you get to choose which substats to roll on with however many rerolls as you want. Given that these stats seem to be randomly higher than usual on occasion, I can't imagine it being too hard to get a capable weapon out of it at all. A 'perfect' one may be difficult, but who knows wether SE has some sort of RNG failsafe in place.
So all in all this seem to me like this relics version of 'choose your own stats', just with its own twist. (Ofc, think about the randomness what you will, but its still miles better than the Diadem weapons - and far from what people are accusing it to be)

Also, given that we're also getting new Armor this time around I don't belive the Weapons will be all that grindy either, but we'll just have to wait and see.

I mean, I get it, Pagos legitimately sucked, Eureka as a whole is divisive, yadda yadda, but sometimes I really wish people would at least have the decency to not judge yet to be released content based on unofficial fan-translations.
(Sidenote: None of this last paragraph was directed at the two people I quoted, in fact I find those two posts to be some of the more reasonable ones. Just used them cause the clarifications happened to answer them Also: Source)