Its time to remove job-based glamour restrictions.

[Victoria_Silverdawn]

That could almost have been valid (not sufficient, but a valid counterargument) before the glamour dresser was added. But now we can have the shared set glamoured as whichever class's AF we're on at the moment, so AF is finally getting more use.

That would be true... but not not everyone uses the glamour chest, as you can use the old glamour system. What you are talking about is a multiglamour system. Which allows each job set it's own look, except SE set up glamour so it's based off gear, not sets. What I am talking about is using some of those nice pieces of armour, and giving them a new use. Cause if they are reusing gear anyways, why not add nice ones.

And the way you just described how the chest works, is the same for battle jobs. Switch the AF to the job used.

But crafting AF has no use. Omni crafters use shared sets, and the AF crafting was outdated when it was added. Only use is people that have only a few crafts and the AF doesn't have the stats to make the 3 star HQ as easily.

Not to mention comparing crafting AF and battle job AF usefulness is like comparing oranges to apples. Battle sets are based off of job lore. There's no reason a PLD should wear the Astrologian gown, or a BLM wearing WHM robes.

Crafting sets, are just cool outfits that make you look like a worker in that trade.

If SE made the glamour chest right, we wouldn't have to worry about each jobs AF sets.