Its time to remove job-based glamour restrictions.

[ximxim]

You speak out my entire thought and yes I support this suggestion.

[Alacran]

Most likely in the minority, but i want more restrictions for race, gender, and jobs. I like individuality, uniqueness is supposed to be the in thing right now right?

[Hestzhyen]

Most likely in the minority, but i want more restrictions for race, gender, and jobs. I like individuality, uniqueness is supposed to be the in thing right now right?

True uniqueness comes from players choosing amongst many options, not adding superfluous restrictions IMO.

[Dreamsoap]

True uniqueness comes from players choosing amongst many options, not adding superfluous restrictions IMO.

I want to be able to express individual style for "job" looks, and by doing so I need certain gears that are locked. I hate being forced to pick from a limited pool - I just end up like everyone else. I'd kill for a certain pair of blacksmith sandals for my monk.

[Claire_Pendragon]

For the whole "Make gender locked gear for males/females" SE has already said, "start threads requesting ONE set of armor to be gender unlocked".
If it gets enough attention/votes, they will work on it. (As they did with the bunny outfit.)

The problem is, people dont listen, and instead, the OP of each thread would list multiple outfits, making it impossible to see a single set as higher priority. (They only work on it over time in their free time, so it takes months)
Then it gets worse, that every time someone starts a thread, people might like it, but then they go off listing their own multiple sets in the same thread.

ONE set per thread, the end.

Thats the ONLY way to get SE to unlock the sets, and it will only be done 1 set at a time.

[InkstainedGwyn]

Most likely in the minority, but i want more restrictions for race, gender, and jobs. I like individuality, uniqueness is supposed to be the in thing right now right?

Very few people are going to glam an entire drg dungeon set onto a red mage. However, if I'm going for a knight-enchanter look, I might want to use some of the armoured gloves and boots, instead of being forced into the same caster sets every other red mage has to wear because like I'm restricted to like 1/6 of the gear in the game. You can mix and match tank chestplates with your dragoon sets to give it a different look.

You get more unique when you're not being forced to wear the same sets as everybody else on the same class.

What you want is exclusivity, not uniqueness.

[Stormfur]

I just want to be able to use my level 70 monk artifact armor on my samurai. And dragoon. and anything else because I love that set.

[shao32]

i dont see this happen i like the role sets being lock, anyone can wear a bikini but not anyone can wear a full plate armor, if they unlock all glamours for everyone then nothing stops letting SE just make 1 set per dungeons or raids bcs why bother? its going to be for all jobs so it will become a waste just desing 7 diferent sets every time, just make 2 or 3 like much and move on.

other think i like the job sets lock its that promote ppl play such jobs bcs looks cool with that glamour and its nothing bad either, i will support more diversity on the all jobs glamour rather that just let everyone wear anything, its what make every job-role special.

[Stormfur]

They've already said though, that they want the uniqueness to lay in the job actions. In the past, it was said that they were locked to certain classes so beginners wouldn't get confused -- is that a mage or a paladin? But by level 70 (or even 60), I know what the mage icons look like vs. the tank ones. So if I want to wear a mix of armor and cloth and be a battlemage, why can't I?

[LastFireAce]

As long ain't weapon glam!