Quote Originally Posted by TinyRedLeaf View Post
Fun fact: I once met someone in Britain whose surname was Ramsbottom.

There are probably no shortage of names in real life that we'd find unusual, or even outright hilarious. The real fun, though, comes from exploring the origin of the name. I would say the same principle applies to Hellsguard names.
In regards to that: Hellsguard dont really have surnames though, so every name is given to an indivual child at birth(?).
Specially the assumed "at birth" part is whats bothering me here - looking at real life surnames, even at something hilarious like "Ramsbottom" is often easly explained by the job the original name-bearer had or the place they lived in or maybe some facial characteristic. The important part to notice though would be that you either would inherite the name (not the case with the Hellsguard names) or were given it at a certain part in your life. For example: The very common german surname "Müller" (=miller) would obviously be given to a miller. Someone having the surname "Ramsbottom" might have an ancestor who had a ram who liked to bump into peoples butts.

However if you have a Roe called "Drunken Stag" and he named like that at birth there isnt much story to tell yet - that child is just born!
But a lot of names kinda imply that there would be a story to tell to give your child a name with such a negative conotation. And thats what I'm asking about - do Roes just get their adult name at an adult age and maybe have a different one during childhood? Is the name not influecend by their own "personalty traits" but rather by their parents, aka does someone whos called "Drunken Stag" has a dad who likes to hunt and drink? Do Hellsguard completly overlook the meaning of the words they're using for their names? Or do they simply dont care - either about the meaning or about given their kids a name that would make life hell for them at a modern school thanks to bullies?