Quote Originally Posted by MoroMurasaki View Post
I find it funny that people seem to think if SE added an ingame parser or even just lifted the weird semi-ban on ACT that they would also be greenlighting harrassment.

Those are two different things. The only difference from the perspective of someone reporting harrassment is that they would actually have to be harrassed in order to complain. Right now if I get an incompetent player in PF I have to silently kick them or lie about 'reforming' where as with talk of parsers opened up I could say something like "Hey, you've got some clear holes in your rotation since you're sitting significantly below average despite your ilvl. Check out a guide and maybe hit the dummy for a bit, thanks for coming though."

Neither of those things is harrassment but right now one of them (the one that helps the underperformer less to boot) is okay while the other (more helpful) one would get me a visit from a GM.
Actually, letting parsing be a thing in the game would lead to too much harassment which is why it will never ever happen. Yoshi P was clear on this many times. Parsing by definition will make this game entirely worse of a community and while I dont oppose parsing like I said in my previous post, it would lead to very unpleasant PUGS. So, regardless of what is reported as harassment, if it has anything to do with parses it would be harassment.