Yeah, people will interpret the value of the top 100 rewards differently. But let's go back to the original question why value matters in the first place:

Quote Originally Posted by Awha View Post
Though leaving that aside why does it matter if someone less skilled has the chance to obtain the same reward over the course of time, while not being able to reach the skill level required to get top 100? Does the fact that someone farmed say 200 feast matches over the course of a year (just an example) detract from the effort and skill one put in to reach top 100 when said reward was relevant?
Players put subjective value in the exclusivity of the past top 100 rewards. If you remove the exclusivity of the reward, then you change a quality of the reward and in turn change its valuation by the players. While the value is subjectively determined, the fact the value exists is an objective fact, and it's being affected. The valuation itself is also not invalid, as we've just discussed. So this change is taking something objective away from the players, regardless of how other players interpret the reward. While the decision is up to those in power, this fact should be acknowledged by the decision makers and those who argue for this move.