Uhm...what? You didn't answer my question at all: there's no point to discussing what we are if we do so with the full knowledge that Square reads none of this. Our discussion only holds water if we assume for the sake of argument that implementations would be put in.
2 month, no longer.2-3 month seasons and I don't care either way about preseasons
Please, quote my claim. I made no claims, I merely pointed out the logical break in "Other games do X, thats why Square does X."You made the claim that the system should be a certain way because SE doesn't do anything about bots and other issues.
Maybe don't read your strawmen into my lips.I didn't put words in your mouth, it was directly implied that you think that SE will never deal with the problems so you suggest using a flawed system to reflect that.
Hey, we're of one mind here.I do want SE to fix the game
If the rewards being more common would harm the game mode and competition, then the game mode is poor. Somebody brought up ADS mount and Field Commander's Coat; how many people have either of those? They're still pretty rare.The way other games approach PVP, and really competitive sports and games in general, don't have excessively short seasons, nor are they excessively long. SE seems to be going with this approach and it's the approach that makes the most sense. The only reason you ever suggested extremely short seasons in the first place was to increase the number of rewards.... in complete disregard to how it would harm the game mode and competition.
As long as you understand how stupid time gated exclusives are.As long as you know it doesn't necessarily make the items as a whole more common, then that's ok. What I suggest is merely removing the time exclusive aspect and not the combined rarity of the rewards.
How about win trading? Something else Square never has or will addressed.Edit: I do want to remark that bots are not a issue in ranked Feast. They are more of a problem in Frontline content

Reply With Quote

