He does use the word “worthless”. I stand my ground: he is discussing value, not valueS
Without any offense intended (you used a smiley so maybe you were nice), the concept of reading also covers understanding a message, not just deciphering letters.
What he says:
• DoTs have become so deemphasized since Stormblood they might as well not even exist. With the loss of Contagion, nothing in your boss kit interacts with any of your debuffs.
Here he develops what he means in his first sentence: they don’t exist in regard of your kit. I’d correct with almost don’t interact, but still.
He doesn’t give a crap they do 20% of the damage because
1 – he knows
2 – it’s not what he tackles.
So people stopping at the first sentence are those I’m talking to. As I acknowledged in my post a bit harshly but the number of comments not understanding his point was getting annoying.
Plus looking at the logs I think OP knows SMN a bit better than some calling him out “you silly I laughed at Dots you know they do 1/5 of the damage”. Just my 2 cents: he knows what they do damage wise, and even probably uses them better.
• With the change of Fester to always give Dreadwyrm Aether, they don't even matter to your basic gameplay rotation anymore.
And indeed, the fact fester deals no damage if dotless, or the facts Dots contribute a lot to damage, has nothing to do with gameplay (value), only DPS (valueS)
• You could literally drop DoTs and go through your entire Trance and Bahamut rotation, unimpeded. It is nothing but invisible damage now.
And I have to say : invisible does not mean non existent. Dots are 33 pps, fester 15 pps, just put the 48 pps back on other skills. Now has your rotation changed (except not applying them) ? No ? Then they are irrelevant gameplay wise. Only relevant damage wise.
• Even if you removed the debuffs from Tri-Disaster, it wouldn't affect how you cast the ogcd. You'd still use it in the same place in your rotation, every time. That's how utterly meaningless the DoTs have become.
To further illustrate what he meant by non-impactful gameplay wise.
So he actually kinda goes in detail about what he means by worthless. He means worthless of value, not worthless on valueS

Reply With Quote





