Healers are way too strong in large scale PvP.

[BubblyBoar]

Issue is mostly that PvP isn't balanced for multiple healers. SE said it themselves that PvP is balanced for the Feast. This leaves large scale PvP a mess.

[Lorielle]

Issue is mostly that PvP isn't balanced for multiple healers. SE said it themselves that PvP is balanced for the Feast. This leaves large scale PvP a mess.

Then why would you make large scale content and then not balance it for that? That's utterly stupid and speaks volumes in how much they care about their PVP system in general. Which, you know, isn't a lot since it took years for them to just lift GC restrictions.

[Zojha]

Issue is mostly that PvP isn't balanced for multiple healers.

Well of course not, if one healer is already broken, then naturally multiple aren't balanced either.

And again, "large scale" PvP is actually the least affected by the issue, by any balancing issue really - the larger the scale, the higher the burst potential and the easier coordination. 200vs200, just mark any target and within a global it's gonna die, regardless of what it is, if it isn't dead by the time you mark it already because people coordinated on a target by accident. Nobody is even going to notice there 'are' healers in that mess. The only imbalances you'll be able to notice there are ranged vs melee and AoE vs single target. It's a mass effect that swallows and overcompensates for imbalances.

Healer impact is actually at its peak when the scale is small - 1vs1, they pretty much win guaranteed. 2vs2 or 3vs3 with one side having a or multiple healers and the other not? Don't bother. What do you think Feast would look like without the role lock? It'd be just as broken as the generator fight in Rival Wings, likely more. What's balanced about Feast is the initial map layout and the fact that both teams get the same amount of gimped and broken forced on them.

People (and I'm not addressing anyone in particular here, because it's far too many) then constantly point to CC as if it meant anything.

Fact is: If somebody is CC'd, they cannot act, so how much power their actions have is irrelevant in that moment - they cannot use them. Even a guy who can one-shot everyone with any skill is going to be defeat-able while CC'd, for the same reason they are defeat-able while AFK, while they're DDOS'd or while their cat sits on their keyboard, namely the inability to use the power they have, however much that might be, whether it's more or less than other players have, whether they're over- or underpowered. And because of that, it's irrelevant when discussing or considering the power of the person that is CC'd, whether in this game or in any other, because the two have nothing to do with each other.

The link between CC and power lies in the fact that the power and value of CC scale proportionally with the power that is being disabled with it. That's why silencing a monk is worthless (It doesn't disable any power) and why CC on healers is so crucial - because they are broken and preventing them from using broken is hugely valuable to the point of being mandatory in small scale PvP. Similarly, CCing a guy that can one-shot people would be highly valuable, far more so than CCing somebody who can barely scrape someone's health bar. Hence why CCing DPS is never a big priority. And because of that, CC is relevant when discussing the power of the people that have it in their toolkit. This is the only angle where it is relevant in the healer debate, because every healer has at least one form of CC. But that isn't taxed in their power budget in the slightest.

"Balance" in this game can be summed up with a simple picture:

No, it isn't physically balanced, it isn't real, it doesn't exist. But if you believe hard enough...