Quote Originally Posted by Claire_Pendragon View Post
-the 2 bolded parts contradict eachother, so I'd wager this is a moot point. (But it is worth mentioning this, because of SE's reasoning behind why they made DRK how it is.)

-Technically it was 4 PLDs and 4 WARs, with the PLDs using hallowed for various parts, and helping with clemency on other parts. the PLDs usually MTed, while the WARs were just DPS with survivability.

-WAR did more dmg as a MT than DRK did. Only reason DRK was the MT, was because part of its DPS requires being hit, and WAR did even more dps in OT than DRK does, so the best way to utilize them both, was to put the DRK into MT stance, despite the fact 2 WARs would do more DPS than DRK+WAR. (plus WAR would mitigate more dmg than a DRK would. My group even did double WAR tanking, even with the slight hit to our LB.)
PLD handled physical heavy fights better than DRK. DRK had to rely on foresight, and a reprisal, in order to survive tank busters, and then living dead when those were down, as every other physical CD was down too.
I forget which all those were, other than Sophia (which DRK is fine for, unless ur other tank dies, and u need to take constant TBs) and A11S, which had me stretch my CDs too thin, as there wasnt magic dmg to worry about.
PLD lacked CDs for magical heavy fights, and usually just did a tank swap, to last long enough till the next CD was ready.



-The difference in DPS, compared to DRK, in 3.0, was roughly +100 for WAR, and -100 for PLD.
- That's not a contradiction regarthless of rotation or situation if you have a drk in your party you will maximize more damage by having him as MT as it will do more damage and the other 2 tanks will do more damage as you later pointed out.

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSwjtz1Jvg4

-war did not do more damage as mt, stance dance=/= tanks stance, if for some reason drk had to saty the whole fight in tank stance drk did more damage overall. war was just op stance dancing mt was the strongest in everything. most of the fights in HW had magic tank buster then they change it but it didn't change anything as drk+war still offered more mitigation and damage.

- I don't know where to begin but if you think the difference was only 100 dps you are denial not only the difference was higher and the fflogs for pallys were mostlly inflated warriors could more constantly bring those numbers pld could only reach it with dedicated groups, not only that the dps gain didn't came only in personal damage, warrior constant slashing debuff and physical damage debuff allowed for dps to hit harder and healers to dps more, combine with drk you had a full magic/physiscal 10% mitigation warrior self sustain also translated into more healer dps, you will overall net more dps with a warrior than what you could ever done with a paladin.
but as you said this was later patched but bringing down the dps checks demand and allowed for more flexible tank damage.
and yeah while for now the gap is 200 between war and drk you are completely right with 5% vs 20%

not only that but there's nothing you will get with one tank you will miss with the other not only the difference in dps is minimal the none of them offer significant pt buffs to blow eachother out of the water, the balance is much better drk just need a small adjustement and we might have it.