
Originally Posted by
Tridus
A DPS doing suboptimal things (not using Enochian), a tank doing suboptimal things (staying in tank stance even during an extended burn phase with no incoming damage and no risk of aggro drop), and a healer doing suboptimal things (massive overhealing, overwriting Medica II with 25 seconds left) are equivalent.
There is literally no case, EVER, where someone would defend a tank that Flashes 6 times, pops Rampart, than stands still waiting for aggro to drop before doing anything else. That is the real equivalence to a healer standing around doing nothing 75% of the fight, because that's the tank standing around doing nothing for 75% of the fight. Any tank that tried that would be kicked. If they came to the forum to complain, they'd be told to knock that crap off, because doing damage helps stuff die faster and is thus a good thing.
DPS doing that is so absurd that the very idea of it is laughable, but their closest equivalent is that Red Mage who complained about how they preferred single target spells do they didn't AoE big pulls. You know what the reaction to that was? I can tell you it wasn't "YoshiP says the content doesn't require AoE", despite the fact that it actually doesn't require AoE. You can burn all that stuff down one target a time successfully, and yet nobody considers that to be a defensible practice.
People react to this because nobody's come up with a good explain for why experienced healers deserve a free pass to stand around doing nothing while everyone else is active. When you know no damage is coming (see: O2N), toss some rocks. If you simply refuse to do that, you're actively refusing to contribute to the group when mechanically you are completely capable of doing so.