Results 1 to 10 of 116

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Community Rep Bayohne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,713
    As you know, Yoshida made a lengthy post (it's 8 pages in Word!) regarding the future of Gathering today.

    Quote Originally Posted by Naoki_Yoshida View Post
    The Future of Gathering Classes
    Good evening (Or is it good morning?)! Producer/Director Yoshida here.
    I’m pretty nervous writing this text seeing how many fervent posts there have been on the subject.

    This is going to be a long one again. I’m thinking it’s the longest to date.
    With that said, I’d appreciate it if you read over it thoroughly when you have the time.

    "Adventure" and "Class" Viewpoint Differences within the Armoury System
    Before I get to talking about Disciples of the Land and Hand, I’d like to touch a bit on the Armoury system.

    The characters in FFXIV are "adventurers."
    Of these adventurers, there are battle classes, gathering classes, and crafting classes. The current Armoury System is parallel in a sense that for any class, you are able to level it up on its own or level it up alongside another class. The Armoury System is such that you can be and do anything you like with a single character.

    In the world of FFXIV, if we were to summarize the play elements on a large scale, you can break it down into three main categories: "fighting", "gathering", and "crafting". I think it goes without saying which class fits into which category.

    Since there are certain classes that fit directly into these three categories, looking at it from a "class" standpoint, I really feel that class identity would bring out the interesting aspects for each class.

    However, looking at it from an "adventurer" standpoint, there is no sense of class identity, because you can play as any class and enjoy any aspect of content as long as you put in the time.

    If you take this all in as an adventurer, it’s possible to experience and play any type of content; however, if you look at it from a class perspective, you will only be able to play certain content.

    There are some players that are citing Ultima Online, but of the tens of existing "skills" you have to make a choice and raise your character. Since there are decided limitations on the skills you can raise, looking at it from the character’s perspective, specific class identities will arise (though it’s possible to re-spec). In the case you would like to experience everything, you will need to level multiple characters.

    However, in the case of FFXIV where you can level classes side by side, there are no limitations on leveling your classes, so it's possible to complete all content with a single character. Naturally, it will take some time, but MMORPGs are created to allow for long periods of play, so as I said in the second Producer Letter LIVE, I’d like you all to go at your own pace and enjoy the game.

    As a result, in order for as many players as possible to enjoy the FFXIV Armoury System, I’d like to ultimately use the Armoury System and matching system to realize the below two core points:
    • It’s possible to experience everything by playing over a long period of time, even if the player can only play for a short amount of time each day
    • Adding specific elements that hardcore gamers will enjoy

    Main Quest Line and Content
    I’d like to give a specific example based on these two standpoints, "adventurer" and "class", for the Armoury System.

    For the main quest that was made before I took over FFXIV, in order to preserve the idea that you can complete the quests as any class, you would have to go around to a vast number of areas for the story aspect only, without battles ensuing. This is the result of the class standpoint at that time.

    However, my thoughts of when I played were not particularly good. Being able to clear content with any class destroys class identity. This is the complete opposite idea to class identity which I mentioned earlier, and it does not bring out unique characteristics.

    In order to create this uniqueness, the thought of "why not just make one large story with multiple points of view for every class" might come to mind, but the problem with this is of course not only the costs associated with it, but also the large amount of restrictions it places on the content.

    The persona of a FFXIV character is that of an adventurer. Classes (and the jobs to be implemented in the future) are the roles that you take on at any given time as an adventurer.

    For example, if you clear a mission of the scenario as a battle-type class, as an adventurer, you’ve already experienced this story. Even if you were to change your class to a Disciple of the Hand and try to experience the same story from a different angle, as an adventurer, this is just merely something that you have already accomplished previously.

    Even if there are quests with different angles, such as scenario A1, scenario A2, scenario A3, they will be no different from scenario A1. It’s possible to flesh out some ideas, fix the axis of time and create "A1", "A2", and "A3" as parallel episodes. However, in this case, after clearing episode A, once you play episode B, you're already heading towards the future of the scenario and if you then play episode A2 or A3, narrative paradoxes will develop.

    So, you're thinking now, "Well, how about if you create a episode A2 version 2 in case you play episode A2 after clearing episode B…" This is just not possible. For a console game, there is a finite end point so something like this is possible. You can even play again from the beginning. But for an MMO, as long as it is being updated, the "what ifs" can continue on infinitely.

    The way to avoid this is to have a flag so if you don't clear A1, A2, or A3 then you will not be able to reach episode B.

    However, if you set it up so A1 is the Disciple of War/Magic one, A2 is the Disciple of the Land one, and A3 is the Disciple of the Hand one, it results in you not being able to move forward unless you play as every class. Creating these types of flags ultimately results in a loss of freedom.

    Well, how about if you make it so if you clear either A1, or A2, or A3 then it counts as a complete clear? Looking at this from a class standpoint this is okay. However, when looking at this from the adventurer standpoint, each class is parallel to one another. Due to this, the development team cannot guarantee that players can see every story as the class they desire to.

    For MMORPGs, since data is saved on the server, it's not like you can simply hit the reset button and roll back your progress.

    It would be possible to set up a prompt when beginning a scenario asking "The scenario will now begin. Since you are playing as a Disciple of the Land, you will be unable to experience this scenario as other classes. Proceed? Yes/No."

    We could make three parallel scenarios that could not all be observed with one character. Considering this, a ton of development resources would be spent and the scenario itself would not progress very far.

    Personally, I do not want to create this type of scenario and I don’t think any of you are looking for a FINAL FANTASY with a non-immersive scenario. This relates to what I was talking about in the recent Producer Letter LIVE when I said "If you want to follow the main storyline, you'll need to level up a battle class after 2.0."

    For a dynamic storyline menacing battles are necessary. With this said, I’d like you progress through the storyline as an adventurer playing the role of a battle class.

    However, it's possible for us to create stand alone quests for Disciples of the Land and Hand classes that do not affect the axis of time for these battles. For example, quests that show the origin of weapons adventurers come in contact with or reforging swords that were broken during other stories. I'd really like to show how the rest of the world is moving forward via these kind of quests.

    Though, it's a fact that these side developments have been placed in lower priority because of where we were previously in a state where there were no quests available.

    In between now and 2.0, I won’t say there will not be any or that or they will not be implemented, but they will be very few in number. If we do not lay the proper foundation, the branches will not develop. However, we are preparing a bunch of content for Disciples of the Land and Hand with the achievement system planned for patch 1.20 (with Land/Hand-specific rewards too).

    Also, the same goes for content that is intertwined with battles.

    "While in the dungeon, if you do not have a Disciple of Land in your party, certain items will not drop. Inside the dungeon there will be doors that can only be opened by keys that can only be made by Disciples of the Hand."

    While it is possible to plan and implement something like this, the below points ultimately display a number of problems.
    • Battle classes would need to save a spot for a class with no battle proficiency (Stressful)
    • Disciples of the Land and Hand will be bored during battles (Stressful)
    • Battle balance would be off if we made Disciples of the Land and Hand count as party members (Stressful)
    If we gave Disciples of the Land and Hand support abilities, then class identity would be destroyed. (I understand that there are comments like this though lol "It's fine! Wouldn't it be cool? Just try it for this dungeon!" So, I'm thinking maybe we can try it out just once if we have the time.)

    With all this said, I really think it is better to create specialized content for each class.

    In addition, I'm considering proceeding with the creation of Ishgard Defense (tentative name) with the goal of content that exists parallel on the class level.

    The future of Disciples of the Land and fundamental class revamps
    For Disciples of War/Magic, I want to provide the joy of fighting and defeating powerful enemies. For Disciples of the Hand, I want to provide a feeling of satisfaction from other players utilizing your created items. For Disciples of the Land, I want to provide a sense of fulfillment for gathering the materials that support the world.

    I want to include content in which those that gather are praised by other players and NPCs for their efforts to travel the world and collect various items.

    The gathering mini-game will be adjusted as follows up to the release of 2.0 (at the latest):
    • Gathering points will be searched for and discovered using a Disciple of the Land-specific ability
    • The gathering points discovered will have different levels, and they can be accessed based on class level
    • If the player has a sufficient Disciple of the Land level, it will be possible to gather at the point
    • Points with rare materials will move around within the area
    • Disciple of the Land-specific abilities will be heavily reviewed
    • A point system similar to TP and MP will be implemented (same for Disciples of the Hand)
    • A reward system similar to exp bonuses will be implemented for successful gathering attempts in succession (also for Disciples of the Hand)
    • Fundamental animation revamps
    • A system for easier gathering will be created (also for Disciples of the Hand)

    We have also prepared a more detailed explanation of specs to implement the above.

    Some aspects within this list cannot be implemented until the servers are revamped. However, we will be doing our best to implement animation revamps, specific ability adjustments, gathered material additions and others before the release of 2.0.

    We have yet to determine a specific timetable, but we plan on working towards implementing the above changes once we have finished adjusting food item effects, food recipes, and other recipes. This is because if we move on before we adjust the recipes, the economy will remain unbalanced.
    (FYI we have a separate team for Disciples of the Land and Hand)

    The triangular relationship between Disciples of War/Magic, Hand, and Land
    Gathering is a primary industry. Disciples of the Land themselves cannot produce a finished product from the materials that they gather, so they must sell their materials in the market or ask a crafter to create a product out of their materials.

    These finished products usually end up in the hands of a Disciple of the War/Magic character. In order to fight, these classes need gear. Medicine and food (food will be fixed appropriately) are also necessary. Of course, there are also items used for fashion, as well as items for Disciples of the Land and Hand, but the overwhelming majority of items are for the battle-related classes.

    These products cannot be sold without demand. Demand from the battle-related classes is spurred on by the introduction of stronger enemies. Players from the battle classes convert their old gear items into materia and equip newer, higher quality gear items to defeat stronger enemies.

    Certainly, a system for buyers to easily find products is also necessary. However, this kind of system will have no use without demand.

    In conclusion, by creating more demand, more products are created and more materials become necessary. This seems simple, but this is the reasoning behind our priorities for future developments:
    1. Alter the battle system
    2. Implement battle content
    3. Revamp recipes (allow more product creation)
    4. Create a system that promotes item consumption (conversion to materia)
    5. Improve connection between buyers and sellers (search feature)
    6. Add new materials and recipes
    If we don’t create a necessity for materials, the act of gathering, which is a primary industry, will not have a role in the economy.

    I have come to the conclusion that instead of focusing time and money towards developing content focused on gatherers, it would be best for gatherers, as well as FFXIV as a whole, to work towards completing the above six goals as quickly as possible.

    The reason I have avoided posting directly about the economy is because it is an incredibly complicated topic. If there were simple solutions to economic problems, there wouldn’t be so many economic recessions across the world and there would be no need for economists.

    Of course, I am thinking about this issue on a more detailed level, but I believe that there would be no solution to this discussion, so I have posted my conclusions. Until we reach 2.0, I would like to work towards achieving the above goals efficiently while taking in your feedback. After we solidify the foundation we can continue to build from there.

    As such, I'm sorry that it has taken me some time to report this, but we do have plans and specs for the future of Disciples of the Land and Hand.

    2.0 and beyond
    I spoke a little bit about housing in the 2nd edition of the LIVE producer letter. I personally came up with the basic design for housing. (We have separate staff working on the details, and I feel bad for them that I was so ambitious with my plans)

    I decided to implement a garden by any means necessary so that we can add content for Disciples of the Land and Hand.

    It is also possible for players to decorate the exterior of buildings using custom architectural items created by Disciples of the Hand using construction material gathered by Disciples of the Land. There are roofs and other architectural items that can be purchased with gil, but custom items will only be attained through Disciples of the Hand and Land.

    We also plan on implementing gardens so that players can plant gysahl greens and raise chocobo chicks.

    Another thing we have planned for housing is an underground facility for building boats and airships. (This will be implemented sometime after the release of 2.0) We will release an image for housing as soon as possible, so please look forward to this patiently.

    Finally
    I have seen many posts asking, "What happened to being able to play only as a Disciple of the Land or Hand?"

    This was a statement from the previous team, and I am very sorry if any of you were under the impression that you can experience all aspects of FFXIV by playing only as a specific class. I would like to officially retract this statement. I'm very sorry for the confusion surrounding this.

    Each class has its own unique abilities. Disciples of the Land have the ability to gather materials, Disciples of the Hand have the ability to create items and Disciples of War/Magic have the ability to challenge enemies. It is possible for FFXIV adventurers to experience all of these things or to ultimately play only as one class.

    I would like adventurers to adventure in the world of FFXIV freely and for everybody to choose their main class however they like. We will continue to work hard toward developing and operating the game to maintain this kind of freedom of choice.
    (221)
    Matt "Bayohne" Hilton - Community Team

  2. #2
    Player
    Nakiamiie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,556
    Character
    Maelina Sylfei
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 64
    "While in the dungeon, if you do not have a Disciple of Land in your party, certain items will not drop. Inside the dungeon there will be doors that can only be opened by keys that can only be made by Disciples of the Hand."
    This is the sort of things I would really enjoy to experience, but I understand the difficulty to properly implement that kind of dungeon.

    Battle classes would need to save a spot for a class with no battle proficiency (Stressful)
    That's not entirely true considering we can switch class any time by switching weapon/tool. It would simply favour people who have both type of class (which is like promoting the armoury system and most people DO level more than a single class).

    Disciples of the Land and Hand will be bored during battles (Stressful)
    Again, it's not entirely true. I saw to solutions for this just during my reading:
    1) The Land or Hand class adventurer can just switch to his battle class;
    2) The Land or Hand class adventurer must perform his activity while other players fend off waves of enemies until he has performed the designed task;

    Also, alternatively, Disciplines of War and Magic would be bored while the Discipline of Land or Hand perform the designed activity. Just like Yoshi-P said in own post, we have to see it from the adventurer's point of view, not the class's. Considering this, we can assume those dungeons would require adventurers to have both a battle class and a crafter/gatherer class. During the dungeon, the adventurers would be required to switch class to perform specific duties. It is even possible to plan for the group to split in smaller groups at certain points of the dungeon! For example, two crafters go repair a broken device while two gatherers are required to gather materials to load the device and at the same time a group of 4 fighters fend off enemies. Then, when the device is repaired by the crafters and loaded by the gatherers, something happens (block the incoming path of enemies, deal a fatal blow to a NM, etc.) that allows the party to proceed.

    That way, the balance is a trade off between more power to fend off the enemies, more man power to repair the device or to load it up. All that with the timer ticking down. It balances itself, you either have to sacrifice time for safety or safety for time. Each could result in different rewards at the end (you need X time to have that special chest, forcing players to choose the least safe setup, unless they want to sacrifice that reward).

    It's ambitious dungeons, but ultimately VERY entertaining and challenging. Much more than the usual "hack 'n slash" dungeons we currently have.

    Battle balance would be off if we made Disciples of the Land and Hand count as party members (Stressful)
    Not really, again, adventurers can switch class. We have to see that from the adventurer's point of view. The final battle could be battled with all battle classes and only require the other discipline to get to it. Or, if you refer to my example above, the other disciplines could be required to deal the final blow on the Boss, while the fighters have to keep it distracted with a minimum of battle members for optimal time completion.

    Gathering points will be searched for and discovered using a Disciple of the Land-specific ability
    Can there also be visual cues for the type of gathering point that has been discovered? For example, if I discover a copper point, there are copper ore chunks that appears instead of the glowing light we currently have (or in addition to it). That would allow for really diverse gathering point in the same area without confusing the player.

    ...or ask a crafter to create a product out of their materials.
    Hopefully, the upcoming search feature with allow to search for people available to do other players' requests. For example, when search for a weaver, instead of simply displaying all the adventurers currently as weavers, it should display:
    1) adventurers as weavers (with no flag up, that means they are not available to do other players' requests)
    2) adventurers as weavers (with a flag up that tells other players they are willing to do requests on demand)
    3) adventurers as other class (with a flag up for weaver that tell other players can do requests on demand)

    That way, you don't have to shout in town for help if you can't have the help from your linkshell and if you are a crafter, you don't have to sit in town when you feel like doing other player's request (you can switch class and do something else in the mean time).

    Just a thought for the search system, instead of bugging everyone on the result list "hey, do you have a moment for a request?" and get the answer "Sorry, I'm busy." and proceed again until you find someone available. Think of it as "Looking for party" but for Discipline of the Hand ("Looking for requests"?).

    I spoke a little bit about housing in the 2nd edition of the LIVE producer letter. I personally came up with the basic design for housing. (We have separate staff working on the details, and I feel bad for them that I was so ambitious with my plans)
    You know, it is that kind of ambition that makes you a great producer. I sincerely hope you have many more other ambitious ideas like that and bring them to us.
    I'm really excited!
    (6)
    LOL cash shop! SE's way to tell their player how they appreciate them... pull the carrot and empty your pockets $$$
    And to those who support it: you are kicking yourselves. -- We just need to sit back and laugh at people with cash shop items.
    (Marvelous economics IQ test!)

  3. #3
    Player
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    453
    Quote Originally Posted by Nakiamiie View Post
    You know, it is that kind of ambition that makes you a great producer. I sincerely hope you have many more other ambitious ideas like that and bring them to us.
    I'm really excited!
    The thing is, it's not really that ambitious though if it's nothing more than an instance lobby for you and your neighbours.
    (2)

  4. #4
    Player
    Holland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa ^^
    Posts
    751
    Character
    Holland Stark
    World
    Faerie
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 24
    Quote Originally Posted by Bayohne View Post
    As you know, Yoshida made a lengthy post (it's 8 pages in Word!) regarding the future of Gathering today.
    I'm glad our Producer/Director knows what he's doing. I hope you are able to realize your ambitions for the three disciplines.
    (4)

    Signature provided by grausekopf ~ Thank you ^^
    Quote Originally Posted by Hikozaemon View Post
    Thanks for the 5 ifrits canes Yoshi i can build a life raft and use them to float to another mmo.

  5. #5
    Player
    Lienn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,949
    Character
    Lienn Deleene
    World
    Gungnir
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Bayohne View Post
    As you know, Yoshida made a lengthy post (it's 8 pages in Word!) regarding the future of Gathering today.
    Such long text just to have me /facepalm.

    So now the dev team motto is "Save the e-peen! Save the World!" Indeed adding hardcore content will fix all gathering and crafting issues of the game...not!

    But thanks to Bay for posting it! At least now we know there will be nothing for DoL/H before 2.0...and way less than expected after too.
    (3)

  6. #6
    Player
    Kiara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    1,462
    Character
    Kiara Silvermoon
    World
    Masamune
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Bayohne View Post
    As you know, Yoshida made a lengthy post (it's 8 pages in Word!) regarding the future of Gathering today.
    Hi Bayohne and Yoshida-san,

    Thank you for the extensive, well thought out reply.

    Even though Botanist is one of my favorite classes to play (to relax), I 100% agree with Yoshida-san's decision.

    It's better for the game to allow the development team to make content that caters and focuses on each Discipline, instead of trying to make the Main Final Fantasy Story Missions be completable by every single Class.

    This allows the development team to make more interesting, challenging, exciting Story Mission Battles and realize interesting mechanics for each chapter, if they know what they're balancing it against (viz., Disciples of War or Magic).

    Even from the early days, I thought it was unrealistic to expect Square to make every Story Mission Boss / Battle be beatable by my Botanist or Carpenter. As I said in Rein's thread, I'm sure they might make some creative way where you can, say, furiously Chop Trees to overcome a Boss, but it's being unrealistic to development costs to make every single Story Mission scenario cater to be cleared by a Crafter, Gatherer or Battle class.

    That being said, there's a ton of awesome-sounding content for Gatherers coming up, and Yoshida-san's thinking about the priorities makes total sense (Supply, Demand, Revisions, etc.).

    I look forward to helping my friends and I make our own Airship and customizing our Player Estates / Houses! Gatherers, Crafters coming together to make some real, meaningful structures / vehicles sounds amazing! (^_^)

    Keep up the good work Yoshida-san!
    (7)

  7. #7
    Player
    Fieros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    188
    Character
    Snoz Berry
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 48
    Quote Originally Posted by Bayohne View Post
    As you know, Yoshida made a lengthy post (it's 8 pages in Word!) regarding the future of Gathering today.
    Thank you for the timely english translation of his lengthy post. Its as if you all are picking up on what it means to publish information globally without alienating the english players.

    +1 for SquareEnix PR.
    (0)

  8. #8
    Player
    kensredemption's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    286
    Character
    Yongdi Washou
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Bayohne View Post
    As you know, Yoshida made a lengthy post (it's 8 pages in Word!) regarding the future of Gathering today.
    TL;Don'tHaveTimeToR

    Anything in here about making XIV more solo-friendly like they initially promised when they announced it at E3 last year?
    (1)
    Quote Originally Posted by Emdub View Post
    Please understand, we love to hear your ideas, but we would like them to be constructive and relevant to the game.
    Formerly Rounnin Tiankeris of Kashuan; reborn as Yongdi Washou of Hyperion.
    May we continue to walk in the light of the crystal and restore Eorzea to its former glory.

    http://lodestone.finalfantasyxiv.com/rc/character/top?cicuid=12044635
    http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/997521/