Please scale the difficulty of Royal Menagerie

[bswpayton]

Your assuming a lot of things with no proof to back it up. I always stay to the bitter end on any groups I joined, may it be pug or other wise and majority of those groups people actually stayed until it was unreasonable, Meaning 10 mins or less,

All I was saying is people have clearly been complaining, the question has already been asked to the devs about nerfing it because its been in a live letter. This isnt the first thread asking for a nerf while I dont agree with a nerf I could understand why some people would want it is all Im saying. But if the devs have already been asked about it being nerf then clearly enough people have had trouble with this fight.

[eaudaemon]

All I was saying is people have clearly been complaining, the question has already been asked to the devs about nerfing it because its been in a live letter. This isnt the first thread asking for a nerf while I dont agree with a nerf I could understand why some people would want it is all Im saying. But if the devs have already been asked about it being nerf then clearly enough people have had trouble with this fight.

But if you noticed, the larger majority just on this thread alone, people said it can be done, so those people complaining are in a sense are a minority and their portraying themselves as a majority doesn't make the statement that "Royal Managerie is Hard" true. Using excuses like: "My Friend is sick" and "I'm only Casual" doesn't make it even harder, it just make them look more entitled.

[aesteval]

But if you noticed, the larger majority just on this thread alone, people said it can be done, so those people complaining are in a sense are a minority and their portraying themselves as a majority doesn't make the statement that "Royal Managerie is Hard" true. Using excuses like: "My Friend is sick" and "I'm only Casual" doesn't make it even harder, it just make them look more entitled.

If we're going to talk about majorities: are the respondents in this thread a statistically significant sample size? I'm guessing no. But the devs do have the data they need to know what's going on.

[eaudaemon]

If we're going to talk about majorities: are the respondents in this thread a statistically significant sample size? I'm guessing no. But the devs do have the data they need to know what's going on.

I'm only using this thread as a basis, I don't have any data on the overall thoughts of 100 active players, but that doesn't mean that OP or others should using: "Majority of the players...", "A lot of Players..." or "those players..." when them themselves don't have thoughts from 100 active players as well.

[Vahlnir]

All I was saying is people have clearly been complaining, the question has already been asked to the devs about nerfing it because its been in a live letter. This isnt the first thread asking for a nerf while I dont agree with a nerf I could understand why some people would want it is all Im saying. But if the devs have already been asked about it being nerf then clearly enough people have had trouble with this fight.

Or on the flip side, they could have seen how many people have cleared (which is a ton of people, mind you) and said it was fine as is. And it IS fine as is. If there was some glaring issue that made it impossible to clear for most then I wouldn't see so many around in tome gear, and the expert queues would be absolutely terrible. Don't need the actual numbers to see that something isn't a problem, honestly.