BLM QOL suggestions to make Enochian less punishing

[Acidblood]

I don't see why you thinking losing Eno is more harsh now than before. ...

While I agree that the lock-out time for Enochian in 3.X could be a bit harsh (especially if the boss disappeared right around the 25-30s mark), that could have easily been fixed by simply lowering the rescast time; say 45s... instead they seem to have been under the impression that casting Blizzard IV once every 20-30 seconds was some major burden.

Using your examples:
In 3.X:
Did you lose Eno after the first 30s?
- Yes, Fire 1 spam for ~25s, curse, start over and remember for next time...
- No, by the time your refreshed Eno ends it'll almost be back up... go into UI, get your MP back, cast Thunder, pre-cast Fire III, re-up Eno, and off you go again at full steam.

In 4.X:
Did you lose Eno after the first 10-12s?
- Yes, Fire 1 spam for 15~20s, curse, and cut your rotation short next time just to be sure....
- No, chances are Eno is back up, but... still (generally) best to be in UI, get your MP back, cast Thunder, re-up Eno, cast Blizzard IV, cast Fire III and continue... waiting the full 30s for Foul to re-build.

So yes, it is faster to get back into, but it is WAY more punishing to drop out of, even if it's only for 0.1s...

Which really sums up the whole issue; the punishment is now too severe for the frequency and ease with which AF/UI stacks, and now, by extension, Enochian, can be dropped. So either:
1. The punishment for dropping stacks needs to be much less (as it used to be pre-4.0) or...
2. The frequency and / or ease of dropping stacks (or Enochian if it was once again a seperate buff) needs to be reduced.

Neither of those changes would reduce what a skilled BLM is capable of, but either of them would make BLM much more enjoyable to play.