Tired of Robe-looking armor

[Enur]

Much agree to the "No robes" part.

Many pant-pieces have belts and such attached to them and its a shame the myriad robe and shirt items makes them go away.

And if the skirt is neccesary, attach them to the pant part so i can choose some better fitting ones. Attaching the skirt to the chest piece makes my cone-y body look like a bell. Not good.

[Stormfur]

+1 to glamour based on class!

Would also like more options than robes or skirts. I mentioned it in one of the sub forums, but I love how the Sky Pirate aiming chest looks, and the other physical ranged DPS sets too. Would love them for a red mage! Add a little bit more armor - we're tough, we can take it! /psych /flex

And more talismans/tattoo-like items too for all classes.

[TristanBlane]

I just want more slutty crop tops for boys :3

[Claire_Pendragon]

As someone who likes the "flowy" stuff, Personally wish most of the "dress" "skirt" or "coat" like part over the legs were actually apart of the legs.
i pretty much have only have a handful of leg options, as all the "flowy" outfits I like, are attached to the body (and i tend to dislike the upper part its attached to) and the leg stuff either looks weird, or doesnt match the body.
sometimes the "skirt" of an outfit would look fantastic with another upper body, but thats almost never possible.
Then for MOST body armor, a bit goes below the belt, and then overrides any "flowy" leg attachments. (an example, the Lv63 Healer legs, have this bow on them, that looks great, but almost every shirt removes the bow, as the shirt extends below the belt. which by default removes all extra bits of ur legs)

[hynaku]

Like to see more dresses and skirt glamours for caster armors.

[Dark-Saviour]

But when players feel the need to have to glamour everything, then it's not that much of an option, now is it?

If it isn't a cute dress or some facsimile thereof, I'm glamming it with a cute dress.

So, yeah... I pretty much feel the need to glamour everything.

[Penthea]

Ain't no point when the glams dont increase with the expansion.

This makes no sense. For there to be no new gear to glam in to there would have to be no new gear. There is plenty of it, it just so happens that it's not to everyone's taste. Not liking the new gear is not the same as having nothing new to glam in to.

[Thunda_Cat_SMASH]

To be honest, I can't say I've noticed any robe armor beyond the SAM AF I predicted.

[Nicodemus_Mercy]

Then...glam? There is plenty of armour in the game that isn't robe-like, and I'm saying that as a person who mains a caster.

There really isn't "plenty" (especially for non-melees) relative to how many pseudo-dresses we get saddled with every time new armor is added. IF we get something that's not a dress, tunic or a coat it's often bare-chested (on males) for the most part or its got friggin dangling bits of useless fabric that serves no purpose at all.

The Thancred Modish body slot item would be an amazing option.... if it didn't have those long green strips of fabric hanging from it and it were dyeable.

We did get one nice non-pseudo dress chest option in SB but sadly its restricted to gatherers (talking about the Gyuki Leather Jacket).

The chest options that aren't pseudo-dresses or long coats and also aren't virtually bare chested, are very few and very far between.

[Hycinthus]

To be honest, I can't say I've noticed any robe armor beyond the SAM AF I predicted.

Not just robe but pseudo dresses or flowy cape. There's barely any non-cape form fitting armor.

Anyway, my point is with new SB armors, it's a missed chance to add other kinds of variety.