Quote Originally Posted by Naunet View Post
I'd rather not be forced into sexy/revealing/skirts/etc just because I play a female character. I much prefer armors that are equal-opportunity in their treatment of covered vs noncovered, heavily armored vs lithly armored, skirts vs pants.
You can make gear that is made to be more fitting for female characters without being revealing, and people shown tons of examples of that. Making everything unisex is just shortcuts. A bit ago I was able to see my sissy with another blm using that 63 glam set. At first we thought the lalafall was just a girl with short hair but she pointed out he had to be male because of how the looked. Then the 3 of them playdead (there was someone else using the healer 63 set) and well.. saw the male lalafall play dead on the other female one, and it got suggestive that point.

My point in this story is, the caster 63 looked too much alike on the boy as it did for girls, I was pretty shocked.