Quote Originally Posted by Sephrick View Post
Dude, just give up.

Let me say this as clear as possible.

You
don't
know
a
damn
thing.

Clearly these things are known about in some vague manner. Which is why they're being asked about. We need clarification.

Imagine a toy maker said they're going to talk about a red circle they're coming out with in a month at their next press conference. Then came out and talked about a blue square they're releasing a year from now.

Concerned customer: "What about the red circle?"

Holland: "Geez guys, seriously. They said it's red and a circle what more do you want? Seriously. Geez. Do you need everything spoon fed? Please take my money toy maker!"

You see it as a win, but I'm not so willing to be duped. The said 1.19/1.20 and beyond. That's 1.19, 1.20, 1.21, 1.22, 1.23 and 2.0.

So they talked about a sixth of what they set out to. Fail
Hmmm. I don't know a damn thing... I see. Can you dispute anything of what I answered ? is anything of what I said not the truth from the mouth of the Producer himself?.

SE is providing as much information as they can in regards to their development of each patch. The process they are taking is in rivalry with how open some western developers are. All it took was for SE to screw up big time on release.

In regards to fees, it is your money. You may or may not subscribe, that is not my problem, but as I said SE has already provided reason why they feel is ok to charge for the game after 1.20 even at a discounted rate like Wada referenced.

And this is fact: SE is providing enough information before patches to receive feedback and make changes necessaries. In none of the previous major patches we have been receiving the information one month in advanced, you are just being picky.