WAR Consolidated Feedback Thread

[Umbeliel]

Feedback threads are good, but the community reps actually told us to NOT use megathreads for feedback innit?

Regardless, what's going on now is a good START- we still have pretty much no identity, no utility, and the damage difference is still too small to warrant bringing a Warrior over a Paladin. Maybe over a drk, but only because drks only have one useful skill and not because they're anywhere near as desireable as a Paladin lol

The Steel Cyclone thing is half hearted. We would have gotten the same benefit out of just... you know, using bloodbath. 22.1% or whatever is too low. Way, way too low to even seriously consider it as a realistic replacement.

[Vejitta]

The Steel Cyclone thing is half hearted. We would have gotten the same benefit out of just... you know, using bloodbath. 22.1% or whatever is too low. Way, way too low to even seriously consider it as a realistic replacement.

I think it was deliberate. I mean, SE constantly pushes us to tank in tanking stance. If you would get Bloodbath back (or anything similar to that), WARs would sit if DPS stance just as they did in 3.x.
I am very happy what they did with Steel Cyclone, it was one of my wishes for a long time, but I agree that HP recovery is somehow lacking these few percent, just like in case Path and IB...

[AdamZ]

I think it was deliberate. I mean, SE constantly pushes us to tank in tanking stance. If you would get Bloodbath back (or anything similar to that), WARs would sit if DPS stance just as they did in 3.x.
I am very happy what they did with Steel Cyclone, it was one of my wishes for a long time, but I agree that HP recovery is somehow lacking these few percent, just like in case Path and IB...

I never understand anyone who says "SE wants tanks in tanking stance". If this is at all true, then WAR design is the most messed up thing they have ever done. It has its abilities locked behind its stances, and has all its dps abilities locked to the dps stance.

[Vejitta]

I never understand anyone who says "SE wants tanks in tanking stance". If this is at all true, then WAR design is the most messed up thing they have ever done. It has its abilities locked behind its stances, and has all its dps abilities locked to the dps stance.

That's exactly why WAR is in such a bad position now and why it was in such good position on 3.x.

[zipzo]

I never understand anyone who says "SE wants tanks in tanking stance". If this is at all true, then WAR design is the most messed up thing they have ever done. It has its abilities locked behind its stances, and has all its dps abilities locked to the dps stance.

I'm not sure what you're saying here. Surely, locking DPS behind the DPS stance would be a surefire way to force tank stance Warriors to focus on tank abilities?

How is their design contradictory to that idea?