Shirk macro

[Dzian]

I can see a use for <tt> on a shirk macro. While the party list us usually consists it is not always. If a tank drops and a new one you s for example they'll be in a different spot in the party list.

Easily fixed with /psort but a tt Macro would make that uneccessary

[mcspamm]

I can see a use for <tt> on a shirk macro. While the party list us usually consists it is not always. If a tank drops and a new one you s for example they'll be in a different spot in the party list.

Easily fixed with /psort but a tt Macro would make that uneccessary

But what if the SAM rips hate?

On a more serious note though, a <tt> macro doesn't allow you to Shirk your co-tank and then Provoke back for additional aggro while you're main tanking (since you can't Shirk yourself).

[eagledorf]

But what if the SAM rips hate?

You Shirk him and hope he learns to use Diversion.

[ChloeGrace]

You Shirk him and hope he learns to use Diversion.

I took Shirk for this express reason.

[Gravton]

But what if the SAM rips hate?

On a more serious note though, a <tt> macro doesn't allow you to Shirk your co-tank and then Provoke back for additional aggro while you're main tanking (since you can't Shirk yourself).

Then don't shirk when Sam has hate. Your target bar shows what your target is targeting. Anyway I just dropped macros that would do what the op requested.