REQUEST: Please change PVP duty incentive

[Beckett]

I disagree. A small subset of players who bot/throw games is worth the huge influx of new players to PVP. I'd much rather spend 30 seconds waiting to get into a match where 1 player out of 24 spends his time running into a wall, than wait 2 hours to get into a match where everyone is active.

I've personally interacted with a bunch of people who previously barely or never touched PVP at all, but are trying it out now because of the new incentives. While they may be new and not know the rules, they have all tried to do the best they can in the match and play the objectives. The bad apples who afk bot for EXP are a very tiny minority, and it's not worth getting rid of the new incentives just to weed them out.

[Dizhonor]

I've personally interacted with a bunch of people who previously barely or never touched PVP at all, but are trying it out now because of the new incentives. While they may be new and not know the rules, they have all tried to do the best they can in the match and play the objectives. The bad apples who afk bot for EXP are a very tiny minority, and it's not worth getting rid of the new incentives just to weed them out.

So it makes sense to you to give the same experience rewards to 1st place and 3rd place? Okay. Do you also think that we should give out gold medals at the Olympics for 1st, 2nd and 3rd place? Or how about giving a Superbowl trophy to all of the teams, even if they don't even make it to the superbowl?

SMH