PUT A DATA CENTER ON THE EAST COAST
Problem instantly solved.
PUT A DATA CENTER ON THE EAST COAST
Problem instantly solved.
Can we force move people off of Leviathan because I dont like them
Thanks


If you really want to do this the best way is reverting back any transfer that bypasses the character creating limit and reimburse the cost. But it won't happen.


At the moment I beileve that SE are taking a moderate respone to the "Balmung population" issue, letting the community sort the issue out.
I mean SE COULD take a rather unemotional responce and close down Balmung and divide the population among low populated world with no respect for FC/LS or firendship groups for the sake of server stablity
and upgrading the servers is not an option and nether is a "Mega server" anyone with any real IT experience know why this is true
Age of War

hmm .. i'm not forcefully logout in the middle of my prime time because of login problem in Leviathan
Seriously, i may have miss the information (too many thread and angry post) but why they can't just dc the server(s) affected by login problem ? If they can't possibly do that, i will at least understand why despite having chosen a server specifically because of its low/medium population i still have to suffer the consequences of another server congestion.
The worse (and only time) i've seen a login queue on siren was during early access and it was a 150 queue.


Man, if they do this, I hope they relocate all the Balmung ERPers onto your servers so that way then YOU can reap what you sowed by demanding such a dumb thing.
.
.
The friends and social reasoning is moot. Any building has population limit, just matter of time before the building can't supply electricity water etc.
Why scream for better facilitiy when there's plenty buildings around. SE job is to make sure all buildings have same running facilities, not just Balmungs.
Balmungs will have to get an eviction order sooner or later. Just like the rest servers have to suck it up everyday.
Contrary to belief outside of expansion launch Balmung is fine the rest of the time..
.
The friends and social reasoning is moot. Any building has population limit, just matter of time before the building can't supply electricity water etc.
Why scream for better facilitiy when there's plenty buildings around. SE job is to make sure all buildings have same running facilities, not just Balmungs.
Balmungs will have to get an eviction order sooner or later. Just like the rest servers have to suck it up everyday.
As long as SE keeps the server locked the population will enevitable decrease over time.
SE was obviously fine beforehand with the servers state considering they kept the transfers open and to be honest I wouldn't be surprised if they open it up again at 4.1 even though I think it's a stupid idea server transfers is easy profit for SE.



Square can't even write code to keep parties together in the separate instances. Imagine how this would work if it forced LS and FCs off the server. So many people will be separated because Square can't write code to keep parties together XD.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



