Would you be against or for rewarding good performance in parties?

[SendohJin]

.....if you're a software developer, why did you automatically assume the implementation of a complex system would have static rules that apply to both a dynamic number of variables and the variables themselves.....?

No, I wasn't referring to anything close to the complexity of machine learning, or artificial intelligence with either my initial post or the high level discussion of interfaces or abstractions. Please explain how you came to that conclusion.

you literally just said not to assume the rules are static. what's the opposite of static rules?

[Lynart]

you literally just said not to assume the rules are static. what's the opposite of static rules?

For mother ****ing sakes do I need to spell it out for both of you "software developers"?

If you have an abstraction or interface, it may or may not be implemented and can be derived.

If an interface or abstraction is enforced on this system for every dungeon, each dungeon could have a unique implementation of said contract. By no means would this involve any artificial intelligence because the developers could simply override or use existing rules from the base implementation (if one exists).

I'm sure we're both very glad we don't work with each other. The above is really basic knowledge; I used the terms interface and abstraction intentionally as they're well understood by anyone that goes onto stackoverflow for work or school.

[SendohJin]

each dungeon could have a unique implementation of said contract.

that just means each dungeon has static rules for the dungeon.

post limit: to clarify, why do you think your unique implementation is going to be besides a set of static rules for that dungeon?