This reason probably is the glamour. There are two glamour similar, one (the dyeable) is harder to craft because of the components, I guess they didn't wanted to kill the market (but then, SE, why did you choose this glamour?).


This reason probably is the glamour. There are two glamour similar, one (the dyeable) is harder to craft because of the components, I guess they didn't wanted to kill the market (but then, SE, why did you choose this glamour?).
The pieces dye in a different way, so again the glamour and economy excuse does not work.Its just like a middle finger to people who "care" about glamour. Can the devs not tell us the reason for why they decided to limit us players even more?
It feels like they wanted to go with the same system we had before and decided on some neat armor pieces but then suddenly changed their mind and we have this big fat tease infront of us. JUST WHY.
Last edited by Kling-Klang; 06-25-2017 at 08:37 PM.
Aren't all of the older models they chose also available for dirt cheap thanks to the Aquapolis?
The Nomad sets are the same models, but they're also undyeable.


I just checked, the reply is no. The stuff is 3M for the cheaper. All crafted.
Some components are still rare and expensive. One component is in aquapolis, the other needs to send aeronef in the right area.
Last edited by Eldevern; 06-28-2017 at 12:16 AM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote

Its just like a middle finger to people who "care" about glamour. Can the devs not tell us the reason for why they decided to limit us players even more?


