Results 1 to 10 of 30

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Exiled_Tonberry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,660
    Character
    Sharl Llyntine
    World
    Jenova
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    IMO, being unreasonable bad at your job is a reason to kick.

    I had a SMN once in Gubal Library HM, no pet out, was spamming miasma, Bio and Bio II, and by spamming I mean he out them up, and them out them up immediately again. never used aetherflow which meant no Fester or Bane.

    He was unreasonably bad at his job to the point where he could have possibly been trolling. Our party agreed to kick him.
    I consider kicking BLMs as well that don't even attempt a rotation and rather used things like Flare at full MP in Umbral Ice stance, sitting there in fire until their MP naturally ticks up for a Blizzard III.

    There is zero reason anyone should have to tolerate that.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Alistaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,980
    Character
    Your Character
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Blue Mage Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Exiled_Tonberry View Post
    IMO, being unreasonable bad at your job is a reason to kick.
    We have confirmation from SE that "refusal to fulfill one's role" is valid.

    And how do you compare that to "unable to fulfill one's role"? IMO that's worse. Refusal can be coerced; I've had times I've threatened to kick people for not playing properly, gotten others to chime in that they'd agree with the kick, and had the offending player change their mind.

    But someone flat out unable to? It's like people with full broken gear mid-dungeon; you can't convince them to suddenly have stats again.

    tl;dr if "refusal to fulfill one's role" is acceptable it follows that inability to do the same is also acceptable
    (0)

Tags for this Thread