Account

[Naithil]

Maybe you know , Developers'll fix it in future ? or it'll on always

i hope they will never do that. Because when MMO switches from p2p to f2p it's a sign that the game loses playerbase.

[SturmChurro]

i hope they will never do that. Because when MMO switches from p2p to f2p it's a sign that the game loses playerbase.

Could just go b2p like ESO, that game is in a good place since switching. (Which is what I think he was asking about)

Disclaimer: I usually still end up paying for the "optional" sub in f2p or b2p mmo's anyway.

[Pintsized]

Could just go b2p like ESO, that game is in a good place since switching. (Which is what I think he was asking about)

Except games like LoTRO, Rift and ESO demonstrate that the game fundamentally changes character when it goes F2P/B2P and in those three games at least, for the worse, either due to a change in the types of people that play 'free' games or more insidiously the game's designers begin to make content designed at its core to 'drive' Store sales.

[SturmChurro]

^

I don't know about the first two but ESO comes out with new content quite frequently and expansions (with yet another one out this summer), it still has a pseudo "sub" feature that lets you have unlimited access to those expansions and a great amount of premium currency to go along with it. Not to mention the cash shop is entirely cosmetic except for a few negligible ease-of-life things. It's much better than it was at it's launch, in my opinion.

That doesn't mean that I am personally for FFXIV to go b2p, I'll pay the sub if I enjoy the game, and I won't go around petitioning for it to go b2p either. Just saying it isn't necessarily always the end of the world if it did.