Houses are lost sooner

[SXTC]

Why should SE care if they do that? I mean someone has to log in and go into the house to keep it -> Subscription paid.

That is where you are wrong, I just said they "lend" their FC to another member or friend. Considering that friend didn't just pay his/her subscription to save the house, and the original owner isn't paying at all.. thats not a win situation for SE.

The community argument is getting old. There's no community. It's clunky and limited, I'd much prefer instanced housing.

If it were up to me, I'd save the housing for the FC owners and force "loners" to get an appartment instead because those houses are too big for just one person anyway.
I'd rather not go down this road but if SE won't solve the problem another way.. I fear this might be the only sollution.

[Shougun]

If it were up to me, I'd save the housing for the FC owners and force "loners" to get an appartment instead because those houses are too big for just one person anyway.
I'd rather not go down this road but if SE won't solve the problem another way.. I fear this might be the only sollution.

I've always felt SE's housing system was too small. All of the competitor housing system's I've tried have been either larger, or MUCH larger - also everyone could get one. I've enjoyed the larger space options from other games, also usually these larger space options = instance which means more customization too (although LotR for example had wards like FFXIV's with larger plots to work with, they also auto generated themselves too so LotR didn't experience the issues as hard as FFXIV does - basically LotR does it better).

In comparison to other games, besides graphics (which are always great), SE's housing system is a strong 4/10 XD.

[Lesan]

That is where you are wrong, I just said they "lend" their FC to another member or friend. Considering that friend didn't just pay his/her subscription to save the house, and the original owner isn't paying at all.. thats not a win situation for SE.



If it were up to me, I'd save the housing for the FC owners and force "loners" to get an appartment instead because those houses are too big for just one person anyway.
I'd rather not go down this road but if SE won't solve the problem another way.. I fear this might be the only sollution.

Would sadly only work if there was an 'FC Activity' meter or something, tracking individual accounts, which allows FCs. Otherwise, the amount of 1 Man FCs would skyrocket.